SMT. SUSHILAMMA W/O HALANAGOUDA v. SHRI SANNAPPA S/O FAKKIRAPPA LAMANI
CRL.RP/100104/2025 · 2025-03-28
V Srishananda
Criminal Appealbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 45316 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 45316 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:5720 CRL.RP No. 100104 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.100104 OF 2025 (397(CR.PC)/438(BNSS))
BETWEEN:
SMT.SUSHILAMMA W/O. HALANAGOUDA, AGED 65 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O. HANGAL, TQ. HANGAL, DIST. HAVERI-581110. …PETITIONER (BY SRI PRAKASH R. BADIGER, ADVOCATE FOR SRI M.R. HIREMATHAD, ADVOCATE)
AND:
SHRI SANNAPPA S/O. FAKKIRAPPA LAMANI, AGE: 37 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. VIVEKANAND NAGAR, HANGAL, TQ. HANGAL, DIST. HAVERI-581110. …RESPONDENT
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/SEC.438 R/W. 442 OF BNSS 2023, SEEKING TO SET ASIDE THE
JUDGMENT DATED 29.01.2025 PASSED BY THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, FTSC-I, AT HAVERI, IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.143/2024 AND THE JUDGMENT OF CONVICTION AND ORDER OF SENTENCE DATED 08.08.2018 PASSED BY PRINCIPLE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT HANGAL IN C.C.NO. 173/2018 FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/SEC. 138 OF NI ACT AND CONSEQUENTLY CONVICT THE RESPONDENT.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
V N BADIGER Digitally signed by V N BADIGER Date: 2025.03.29 11:51:34 +0530
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:5720 CRL.RP No. 100104 of 2025
ORAL ORDER
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA)
Memo is filed by learned counsel for the petitioner for withdrawal. Memo reads as under:
“The petitioner respectfully submitted that present petition may permit to withdrawal and permit to file fresh petition as criminal appeal and may direct to register to return the documents to meet the interest of justice.”
Placing the memo on record, revision petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
Time spent before this Court in this revision petition shall be excluded for the purpose of competition of limitation under Section 14 of the Limitation Act.
SD/- (V.SRISHANANDA) JUDGE
KAV CT:PA LIST NO.: 2 SL NO.: 6