Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:89483 Court No. - 68 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 13062 of 2025 Applicant :- Vakeel And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Aishwarya Pratap Singh,Tabrez Ahmad Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Ashutosh Srivastava,J. 1. Heard Shri Tabrez Ahmad, learned counsel for the applicants, Shri Rajesh Kumar Singh, learned AGA for the State-respondents and perused the record. 2. This bail application under Section 483 BNSS has been moved on behalf of accused-applicants, Ajeej, seeking enlargement on bail in Case Crime No. 165 of 2025, under Section 3/5/8 of Cow Slaughter Act, P.S.- Lisari Gate, District- Meerut, during pendency of the trial in the Court below. 3. Learned counsel for the applicants argued that the accused- applicants are innocent. They have been falsely implicated in this case crime number and are languishing in jail since 13.03.2025. They have no criminal antecedent and there is no likelihood of their fleeing from course of justice or tampering with evidence in case of release on bail. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the applicants have no concern with the alleged recovered cow beef of 90 Kg. in the present case and having no concern with the alleged meat shop of co-accused Shahzad. In fact alleged recovery has been made from the meat shop of co-accused Shahzad, who is having valid license of meat processing unit since 14.01.2025 and the police fabricated false story in relation to his false implication in the present case. There is no independent witness of the alleged recovery of the beef. There is no independent public witness of the alleged recovery dated 13.03.2025. It is further submitted that the investigating officer has not submitted charge sheet till date against the applicant and investigation is still pending. It is next submitted that the applicants is fully innocent and nothing to do with the alleged crime in any manner. Hence, bail has been prayed for. 4. Learned AGA has opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid facts. 5. Considering all above facts and circumstances, the nature of accusations, severity of the punishment in the case of conviction and nature of supporting evidence, reasonable apprehension of tampering with the witness and prima facie case, but without commenting on merit of case, a case for bail is made out. 6. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. 7. Let the accused-applicants, Vakeel and Asharaf involved in above mentioned case crime number be released on bail, on their executing a personal bond and two reliable sureties each, in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicants will not tamper with the evidence. 2. The applicants will not indulge in any criminal activity. 3. The applicants will not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witnesses and co-operate in the trial. 4. The applicants will appear regularly on each and every date fixed by the trial court, unless their personal appearance are exempted through counsel by the court concerned. 8. In the event of breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the court below will be at liberty to proceed to cancel their bail. Order Date :- 26.5.2025 Ravi Prakash (Ashutosh Srivastava, J.) Digitally signed by :- RAVI PRAKASH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad