ARVIND KUMAR ARORA S/O SHRI GYAN CHAND ARORA v. THE RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
CW/16339/2024 · 2025-11-21
Baljinder Singh Sandhu, Mahendar Kumar Goyal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 45311 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 45311 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:47179-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16339/2024 Arvind Kumar Arora S/o Shri Gyan Chand Arora, Aged About 45 Years, Resident Of C-74, J.p. Colony, Tonk Phatak, Jaipur, Rajasthan 302015. ----Petitioner Versus
1. The Rajasthan High Court, Through Registrar General, Rajasthan High Court Building, Jodhpur, Rajasthan.
2. Registrar (Examination), Rajasthan High Court, Jodhpur, Rajasthan High Court Building, Jodhpur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents Connected With D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16767/2024 Chandra Kant Chauhan S/o Shri Rameshwar Singh, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Vpo Maloni Panwar, Tehsil Saipau, Dholpur, Rajasthan ----Petitioner Versus
1. The Rajasthan High Court, Through Registrar General, Rajasthan High Court Building, Jodhpur, Rajasthan.
2. Registrar (Examination), Rajasthan High Court, Jodhpur, Rajasthan High Court Building, Jodhpur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17012/2024 Sanjay Kumar Jatav S/o Late Ram Chandra, Aged About 45 Years, R/o 168, Mahadev Nagar, Gandhi Path, Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus
1. The Rajasthan High Court, Through Registrar General, Rajasthan High Court Building, Jodhpur, Rajasthan.
2. Registrar (Examination), Rajasthan High Court, Jodhpur, Rajasthan High Court Building, Jodhpur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents
[2025:RJ-JP:47179-DB] (2 of 2) [CW-16339/2024] For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Harsh Pareek Mr. Y.K. Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vishnu Kant Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU Judgment / Order 21/11/2025 In view of the fact that the petitioners have failed to pass the main examination and are rendered ineligible for appointment, these writ petitions are dismissed as infructuous keeping the legal question(s) involved herein open. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.
(BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU),J (MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J Manish/72-74