- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:248 RPFC No. 100134 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH REV.PET FAMILY COURT NO. 100134 OF 2022 (-) BETWEEN: 1. RUDRAVVA @ UMAVATI W/O. KALAVEERAPPA UPPANASI, AGE. 59 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD, C/O. P. M. BENNUR, ADVOCATE R/O. VIDYA NAGAR, WEST EXTN., KORI BUILDING, HAVERI TQ AND DIST. HAVERI. 2. KAVITA D/O. KALAVEERAPPA UPPANASI, AGE. 23 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD WORK, C/O. P. M. BENNUR, ADVOCATE R/O. VIDYA NAGAR, WEST EXTN., KORI BUILDING, HAVERI, TQ AND DIST. HAVERI …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. G. I. GACHCHINAMATH, ADVOCATE) AND: KALAVEERAPPA V UPPANASI AGE. 57 YEARS, OCC. CENTRAL GOVERNMENT WORK, SENIOR POSTMAN, V N BADIGER Digitally signed by V N BADIGER Date: 2025.01.10 16:40:28 +0530 - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:248 RPFC No. 100134 of 2022 R/O. MRUTUNJAYA NAGAR, POST OFFICE, DHARWAD-580006, NOW RESIDENT OF SHIVAGANGA NAGAR, KAMATI PLOT, SAUNDATTI ROAD, DHARWAD, DIST: DHARWAD. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. SHRIKANT T. PATIL, SRI. ROHIT S. PATIL AND SRI. KAMALAKAR M. S., ADVOCATES) ------ THIS RPFC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 19(4) OF THE FAMILY COURTS ACT, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 06.03.2021 MADE IN CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS NO.01/2020 PASSED BY THE FAMILY COURT, HAVERI AND FURTHER AWARD THE MAINTENANCE AS PRAYED BY THE PETITIONERS IN THEIR CRL. MISC. NO.1/2020. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners has filed memo stating that the petitioner No.1-mother of the petitioner No.2 is no more and accordingly, petitioner No.2 be considered as legal heir of the deceased petitioner No.1. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:248 RPFC No. 100134 of 2022 2. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent submitted that the respondent is the husband of deceased petitioner No.1. It is also submitted by learned counsel appearing for the respondent that the petitioner No.2-daughter of the petitioner No.1-wife, is married. 3. In that view of the matter, I am of the view that the petition does not survive for consideration. However, insofar as the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners with regard to claiming arrears of maintenance is concerned, it is open for the petitioner No.2 to approach the competent Court for redressal of her grievance. 4. In this regard, the revision petition is disposed off. Sd/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE SMM CT:ANB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6