Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 TA-1347-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.207 TA-1347-2025 Date of Decision: 29.01.2026 MANISHA ....Applicant Versus
SUNNY
.....Respondent
CORAM:
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ARCHANA PURI Present:- Mr. Vishal Mittal, Advocate for the applicant. None for the respondent. ***** ARCHANA PURI, J. (Oral) As observed in the previous order, despite service, the respondent did not make appearance, on that date. Even today, he has not made appearance. As such, respondent is proceeded against ex parte. Counsel for the applicant heard. The applicant-wife has filed the present application for seeking transfer of the petition under Section 13 (1) (ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act i.e. DMC/168/2025, titled ‘Sunny V/s Smt. Manisha, filed by the respondent- husband, pending in the Family Court, Charkhi Dadri and she seeks transfer of the same to Family Court (Camp Court), Mahendergarh. At the very outset, it is submitted by the counsel for the applicant that the marriage between the parties to the lis, had taken place on 07.12.2020, but no child was born from the said wedlock. The applicant is not having any source of earning and is dependent upon her parental family. PREETI 2026.01.30 15:12 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
2 TA-1347-2025 The applicant has filed petition under Section 144 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, which is pending in the courts at Narnaul and respondent is making appearance in the same. Besides the same, she has also got lodged FIR No.69 dated 16.10.2024, wherein challan has been presented in the courts at Narnaul and the respondent is making appearance in the same. The distance between the two places is stated to be 75 kms. In view of the submissions made aforesaid and taking into
consideration the fact of other two litigation arising from the broken marriage, to be already pending in the courts at Narnaul, more particularly, the criminal case, wherein the respondent is required to make appearance on each and every date of hearing and above it, the respondent having not come forward to resist the transfer application, the same is allowed and the petition under Section 13 (1) (ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act i.e. DMC/168/2025, titled ‘Sunny V/s Smt. Manisha, filed by the respondent-husband, stands transferred from the Family Court, Charkhi Dadri, to Family Court (Camp Court), Mahendergarh. The requisite record of the aforesaid case be sent by the Family Court, Charkhi Dadri, to the District and Sessions Judge, Narnaul. Learned District and Sessions Judge, Narnaul, shall assign the said petition to the Family Court (Camp Court), Mahendergarh. Even, the parties are directed to appear before the Family Court (Camp Court), Mahendergarh, within a period of one month from today onwards.
(ARCHANA PURI) 29.01.2026 JUDGE Sonu Saini Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : Yes/No PREETI 2026.01.30 15:12 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document