Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 45299 (PNJ)

ARUN SIHAG v. SAROJ RANI

CRM-M/43645/2018 · 2025-05-20

Jasgurpreet Singh Puri

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-43645-2018 (O&M) and - 1- CRM-M-59754-2023 (O&M 238 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-43645-2018 (O&M) Date of Decision:20.05.2025 (I) Arun Sihag ....Petitioner(s) Versus Saroj Rani .....Respondent(s) CRM-M-59754-2023 (O&M (II) Arun Sihag and another ....Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana and another .....Respondent(s) CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JASGURPREET SINGH PURI Present: Mr. Kinshuk Nanda, Advocate, for the petitioners in CRM-M-59754-2023. None for the petitioner in CRM-M-43645-2018. Mr. Vishal Kashyap, DAG, Haryana. **** JASGURPREET SINGH PURI , J. (Oral) 1. Both the petitions are taken up together with the consent of learned counsel for the parties since both the petitions are inter-connected. 2. CRM-M-43645-2018 has been filed for transfer of the trial in FIR No.0149 dated 25.05.2018, under Sections 498A, 506, 323 and 406 IPC, registered at Police Station Civil Lines, Bhiwani to the Court of competent jurisdiction at Panchkula from Bhiwani and CRM-M-59754-2023 RAKESH KUMAR 2025.05.26 16:46 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment CRM-M-43645-2018 (O&M) and - 2- CRM-M-59754-2023 (O&M has been filed for quashing of the aforesaid FIR. 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners in CRM- M-59754-2023 as well as learned State counsel have stated that the trial has already been concluded and therefore, nothing would survive in the present petitions and the same may be disposed of accordingly. 3. Order accordingly. 20.05.2025 (JASGURPREET SINGH PURI) rakesh JUDGE Whether speaking : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No RAKESH KUMAR 2025.05.26 16:46 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment