Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 45296 (ALL)

PRADEEP KUMAR PATHAK AND 11 ORS. v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/39511/2016 · 2025-02-17

Saral Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:23401 Court No. - 32 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 39511 of 2016 Petitioner :- Pradeep Kumar Pathak And 11 Ors. Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Hritudhwaj Pratap Sahi,Prabhaker Awasthi,Prashant Kumar Tripathi,Rajeev Misra Counsel for Respondent :- ,C.S.C.,H.P.Sahi,Om Prakash Ojha,Prabhakar Awasthi,V.K.Singh Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J. It appears that by efflux of time, no cause of action survives in the present petition and the writ petition has become infructuous. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. In case, cause of action survives in the writ petition, the petitioners may file a recall application within a period of two months to recall the said order. Order Date :- 18.2.2025 Sattyarth Digitally signed by :- SATTYARTH ANAND High Court of Judicature at Allahabad