Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 45285 (RAJ)

GUJARMAL S/O TARA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/13924/2025 · 2025-11-28

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:48501] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13924/2025 1. Gujarmal S/o Tara, R/o Berla, Police Station Jairoli, District Khairthal-Tijara, Raj. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail, Kishangarhbas). 2. Mukesh S/o Gujarmal, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Berla, Police Station Jairoli, District Khairthal-Tijara, Raj. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail, Kishangarhbas). 3. Deepak S/o Gujarmal, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Berla, Police Station Jairoli, District Khairthal-Tijara, Raj. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail, Kishangarhbas). ----Applicants Versus State of Rajasthan through PP ----Respondent For Applicant(s) : Mr. Aslam S. Khan For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP Mr. Lokesh Kumar Meena, S.I., PS- Jairoli, District Bhiwadi HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 28/11/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicants. The accused-applicants were arrested in connection with FIR No. 53/2025 registered at Police Station Jairoli District Bhiwadi for the offence(s) under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2), 74 & 79 of BNS, 2023. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicants submitted that there are three applicants one is father and his two sons. It is further submitted that the applicants have been in judicial custody [2025:RJ-JP:48501] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-13924/2025] since 19.09.2025 and that they have no criminal antecedents. It is also submitted that both parties sustained injuries and that the incident in question took place on agricultural land. It is further submitted that the altercation arose out of certain disputes relating to the relationship between the applicants and the complainant’s family, who are neighbours. It is lastly submitted that the applicants are ready to abide by any condition that may be imposed by this Court, as all male members of a family are presently behind the bars. 3. Officer has marked attendance and submitted that the injuries sustained are grievous in nature, with multiple injuries suffered by both sides. It is further submitted that the parties are neighbours and belong to the same caste. It is also submitted that the altercation occurred on account of certain confusion, leading to the incident. 4. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the arguments advanced by the counsel for the parties, considering that the applicants have no criminal antecedents; that all the male members of a family are incarcerated; that both parties sustained injuries but without commenting on merits/demerits of the case, this court is inclined to allow the bail application of the accused-applicants and enlarge them on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that accused-applicants Gujarmal S/o Tara, Mukesh S/o Gujarmal & Deepak S/o Gujarmal shall be enlarged on bail provided they furnish a [2025:RJ-JP:48501] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-13924/2025] personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Judge for their appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so. (SAMEER JAIN),J JKP/64