HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 937 of 2025 (M/S) Deepak Mehta ….......Petitioner Versus M/S Escorts Farms Ramgarh Ltd. and others ..…..... Respondents Present : Mr. Shivanand Bhatt, Advocate for the petitioner. JUDGMENT Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral) The petitioner seeks directions that the Civil Suit No.56 of 2024, Deepak Mehta Vs. M/S Escorts Farms Ramgarh Ltd. and others along with the pending temporary injunction application be decided as expeditiously as possible. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 3. On the last date, the Court had required learned counsel for the petitioner to file temporary injunction application that has been filed in the suit. Now, it has been filed. 4. In fact, it is surprising to note that in order-sheet of the case, when the matter was registered on 29.05.2024, no reference has been made to the temporary injunction application. The case is fixed for Written Statement/ issues. This Court believes that the court below shall take note of what the Court has observed herein. 5. Cases may not be expedited on mere filing of a petition. Cases are prioritized and listed according to the pendency of cases in a particular court. Simply because some litigant approaches this Court, a case may not be prioritized. This is one aspect of the 2 matter. Another aspect of the matter is that every case needs expeditious disposal. But then, as stated, cases are prioritized based on the age of the cases, position of the parties, etc. 6. This Court has no doubt that the court concerned should make endeavour to decide cases pending in the court as expeditiously as possible, as per priority and pendency of the cases in that court. 7. With the above observation, the writ petition stands disposed of accordingly. (Ravindra Maithani, J.) 08.04.2025 Sanjay