Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 45276 (CHH)

DUWASIYA BAI v. NAND KISHORE @ NANDU MAHRAJ (DIED) THROUGH LRS

MCC/1188/2024 · 2025-01-02

Shri Sanjay K Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 (MCC No. 1188 of 2024) 2025:CGHC:146 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 1188 of 2024 1 - Duwasiya Bai D/o. Ratan Das Satnami Aged About 65 Years R/o. Belgahna, Up-Tahsil - Belgahna, Tahsil - Kota, Dist. Bilaspur (C.G.) --- Applicant(s) versus 1 - Nand Kishore @ Nandu Mahraj (Died) Through Lrs 1-A - Prashant Pandey S/o Late Nand Kishore Pandey Aged About 45 Years R/o Belgahna, Up-Tahsil - Belgahna, Tahsil - Kota, Dist. Bilaspur (C.G.) 1-B - Prabhat Pandey S/o Late Nand Kishore Pandey Aged About 40 Years R/o Belgahna, Up-Tahsil - Belgahna, Tahsil - Kota, Dist. Bilaspur (C.G.) 1-C - Mamta D/o Late Nand Kishore Pandey Aged About 50 Years R/o Belgahna, Up-Tahsil - Belgahna, Tahsil - Kota, Dist. Bilaspur (C.G.) 1-D - Sarita D/o Late Nand Kishore Pandey Aged About 48 Years R/o Belgahna, Up-Tahsil - Belgahna, Tahsil - Kota, Dist. Bilaspur (C.G.) 1-E - Sukrita D/o Late Nand Kishore Pandey Aged About 35 Years R/o Belgahna, Up-Tahsil - Belgahna, Tahsil - Kota, Dist. Bilaspur (C.G.) 2 - Ram Awtar S/o Pyare Lal Bramhan Aged About 50 Years R/o Belgahna, Up-Tahsil - Belgahna, Tahsil - Kota, Dist. Bilaspur (C.G.) --- Non-applicant(s) (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Applicant : Mr. Punit Ruparel, Advocate ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ADITI DIWAN KAIWART Digitally signed by ADITI DIWAN KAIWART 2 (MCC No. 1188 of 2024) SB- Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 02.01.2025 1. Heard on IA No.01, which is an application seeking condonation of delay in filing the application for restoration of MCC No.741/2023. 2. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed and the delay caused in filing the instant MCC is hereby condoned. 3. With the consent of the parties, heard finally. 4. This MCC has been filed seeking restoration of MCC No.741/2023, which was dismissed for want of prosecution by order of this Court dated 18.07.2024. 5. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. MCC No.741/2023 is restored to its original number for its hearing and disposal in accordance with law. 6. Accordingly, the MCC is allowed. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge @d!t!