Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 45274 (PNJ)

MAJOR SINGH AND ORS. v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OS.

CWP/18738/2007 · 2025-05-15

Aman Chaudhary

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT 1094-2 Major Singh and others State of Punjab and others CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Present: Mr. Shivam Kapila, Advocate for Mr. Kapil Kakkar, Advocate for the petitioners Mr. Swapan *** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral) 1. Prayer made in the present petitions for quashing of seni dated 26.03.2007, might not due to ef in wake of fact that while issuing notice of declined on 13.12.2007. 2. Learned counsel also submits that despite best efforts he has been unable to establish contact with the petitioners 3. Disposed of, reserving the petitioner by demonstrating that the 15.05.2025 ashok Whether speaking/reasoned : Whether reportable : IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Major Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab and others HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. Shivam Kapila, Advocate for Mr. Kapil Kakkar, Advocate for the petitioners Mr. Swapan Shorey, DAG, Punjab *** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral) Prayer made in the present petitions for quashing of seni dated 26.03.2007, might not due to efflux of time, even be surviving, especially in wake of fact that while issuing notice of declined on 13.12.2007. Learned counsel also submits that despite best efforts he has been unable to establish contact with the petitioners. Disposed of, reserving the petitioner by demonstrating that the lis still survives. ( AMAN CHAUDHARY ) Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-18738-2007 (O&M) Date of decision: 15.05.2025 …. Petitioners …. Respondents HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. Shivam Kapila, Advocate for Mr. Kapil Kakkar, Advocate for the petitioners. Shorey, DAG, Punjab. Prayer made in the present petitions for quashing of seniority list flux of time, even be surviving, especially in wake of fact that while issuing notice of motion, stay had been specifically Learned counsel also submits that despite best efforts he has been . Disposed of, reserving the petitioners with a liberty to get it revived ( AMAN CHAUDHARY ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No .2025 ority list flux of time, even be surviving, especially stay had been specifically Learned counsel also submits that despite best efforts he has been with a liberty to get it revived, ASHOK KUMAR 2025.05.16 17:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document