Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 45271 (RAJ)

ROHTASH S/O MAHENDRA v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/13990/2025 · 2025-10-30

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:43627] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13990/2025 1. Rohtash S/o Mahendra, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Matuki, Police Station Kaithwara, District Deeg, Rajasthan. 2. Brijlata W/o Rahtash, R/o Matuki, Police Station Kaithwara, District Deeg, Rajasthan. ----Applicants Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Akshat Chaudhary For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 30/10/2025 1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 482 BNSS in connection with FIR No. 75/2025 registered at Police Station Kaithwara District Deeg for the offence(s) under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 121(1), 132, 109(1), 310(2) of BNS, 2023 & under Section 3 of Public Property Damage Prevention Act, 1984. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicants has submitted that the co-accused have already been released on regular bail. It is further submitted that there are no criminal antecedents against the applicants. It is also submitted that the nature of injuries allegedly sustained by the police personnel is simple in nature. It is further submitted that the entire family, comprising of thirteen (13) members, has been falsely implicated in the present case. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. [2025:RJ-JP:43627] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-13990/2025] 4. Considering the arguments advanced by the counsel for the parties, considering that there are no criminal antecedents against the applicants; that both the applicants are of young age; that injuries sustained are simple in nature and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case and material on record but without commenting on merits/demerits of the case, this court is inclined to allow the bail application of the accused-applicants and enlarge them on bail. 5. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is allowed. The S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer, Police Station Kaithwara District Deeg in F.I.R. No. 75/2025 is directed that in the event of arrest of the accused-applicants Rohtash S/o Mahendra & Brijlata W/o Rahtash shall be released on bail, provided they furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:- (i) that the applicants shall make themselves available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) that the applicants shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and (iii) that the applicants shall not leave India without previous permission of the court. (SAMEER JAIN),J JKP/184