1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 07.04.2025 CORAM THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN W.P.No.12326 of 2025 M.Karuppiah Raja .. Petitioner Vs. 1.The Commissioner of Municipal Administration, Urban Administrative Building, No.3, MRC Nagar, Raja Annamalaipuram, Chennai – 600 028. 2.The Director, Local Fund Audit Department, Saidapet, Chennai – 600 035. 3.The Commissioner, Tambaram City Municipal Corporation, Tambaram. 4.The Regional Joint Director, Local Fund Audit Department, Chengalpattu Region, Maraimalai Nagar, Chengalpattu District – 603 209. .. Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to conduct a Joint Sitting for clearing the audit objections raised by the 4th respondent https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2 office with regard to the petitioner and to consider the explanations submitted by the petitioner for the audit objections raised by the 4th respondent office and to pass necessary orders and to issue No Due Certificate to the petitioner for the period he worked in the 3rd respondent office within a time frame fixed by this Court. For Petitioner .. Mr.Balaji Sankara Moorthy For R1 .. Ms.S.Mythreye Chandru, SGP For R2, R4 .. Mr.M.Shajahan, SGP For R3 .. Mr.P.Srinivas, Standing Counsel ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed in the nature of a Mandamus seeking a direction against the respondents to conduct a Joint Sitting to clear the audit objections raised by the 4th respondent / The Regional Joint Director, Local Fund Audit Department, Chengalpattu District, relating to the audit objections raised. 2.It had been contended that the petitioner who had been initially appointed as Junior Engineer in the Municipal Administration Department https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 3 had been continuously working for more than 37 years and is due to retire on attaining the age of superannuation on 31.05.2025. It had been stated that the audit objections had been raised by the 4th respondent for which the petitioner had given an explanation. That particular explanation will have to be examined on a Joint Sitting conducted by the respondents. Since the petitioner is to retire on 31.05.2025, he had sought a Mandamus that the Joint Sitting should be done at the earliest, so that it would not prejudice the interest of the petitioner. 3.A direction is given to the respondents that the Joint Sitting should be held on or before 21.05.2025 and any decision taken therein must be conveyed to the petitioner. Accordingly, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs. 07.04.2025 Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No smv https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 4 To 1.The Commissioner of Municipal Administration, Urban Administrative Building, No.3, MRC Nagar, Raja Annamalaipuram, Chennai – 600 028. 2.The Director, Local Fund Audit Department, Saidapet, Chennai – 600 035. 3.The Commissioner, Tambaram City Municipal Corporation, Tambaram. 4.The Regional Joint Director, Local Fund Audit Department, Chengalpattu Region, Maraimalai Nagar, Chengalpattu District – 603 209. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 5 C.V.KARTHIKEYAN,J. smv W.P.No.12326 of 2025 07.04.2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis