Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 45266 (KAR)

SMT SANGAVVA W/O. RUDRAGOUDA KUDARI v. NINGANAGOUDA S/O. SHIVANAGOUDA KENCHANAGOUDRA

RSA/100055/2024 · 2025-02-17

E S Indiresh

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH, DHARWAD DATED THIS 17TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH RSA NO. 100055 OF 2024 BETWEEN: 1 . SMT SANGAVVA W/O. RUDRAGOUDA KUDARI AGE. 56 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. HADALI, TQ. NAVALGUND, DISTRICT. GADAG. ... APPELLANT (BY SRI. BHAGYASHREE N. BIKKANNAVAR & G V BHARAMAGOUDR , ADVOCATES FOR APPELLANT) AND 1 . NINGANAGOUDA S/O. SHIVANAGOUDA KENCHANAGOUDRA AGE. 53 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. TUPPADAKURAHATTI, TQ. NAVALGUND, DISTRICT. GADAG. 2 . BASANAGOUDA S/O. SHIVANAGOUDA KENCHANAGOUDRA AGE. 48 YEARS, OCC. TEACHER, R/O. KANNADA SCHOOL, KALKOTI, TQ. SAVANUR, DISTRICT. HAVERI. 3 . SMT. VIJAYALAXMI W/O. VEERANAGOUDA KENCHANAGOUDRA AGE. 58 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE HOLD WORK, R/O. BASAVESHWAR NAGAR, GOVERNMENT BOYS HOSTEL, TQ. MUNDARAGI, DISTRICT. GADAG. 2 4 . SMT. KALAVATI W/O. RAVI ITAGI AGE. 37 YEARS, OCC. SERVICE, R/O. ANNADANESHWAR MAHAVIDYALAYA, MUNDARAGI, TQ. MUNDARAGI, DISTRICT. GADAG. 5 . SHANKARAGOUDA S/O. VEERANAGOUDA KENCHANAGOUDRA AGE. 36 YEARS, OCC. SERVICE, R/O. NEAR BUMARADDI MILL, MUNDARAGI, TQ. MUNDARAGI, DISTRICT. GADAG. ...RESPONDENTS RSA FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, 1908, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 17.03.2023 PASSED IN R.A.NO.20/2021 ON THE FILE OF THE III ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS AND SPECIAL JUDGE, DHARWAD, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 21.09.2020 PASSED IN O.S. NO.258/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS, NAVALGUND, PARTLY DECREEING THE SUIT FILED FOR PARTITION AND SEPARATE POSSESSION. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING; O R D E R Finally, three weeks’ time is granted to comply with the office objections, failing which, the appeal shall be dismissed without reference to the Bench for non-prosecution. SD/- JUDGE 3 Note:- As per endorsement made in the order sheet dated 22.03.2025. Counsels for the appellant has not complied the office objections. Hence, this RSA No. 100055/2024 stands dismissed without reference to the Bench for non- prosecution as per the Court Order dated 17.02.2025. BY ORDER OF THE COURT SD/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR. R- By:-rv C- By:-rv T- By: - psl