Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:103395 Court No. - 38 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 32534 of 2015 Petitioner :- Ram Khiladi Verma Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Hemendra Kumar,Himanshu Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Gagan Mehta,Vivek Varma Hon'ble Donadi Ramesh,J. 1. The present writ petition is filed to issue mandamus to respondent nos. 2, 3 and 4 to grant pension to the petitioners and also promotional scales. 2. At the stage of admission, this Court has passed the following order on 08.07.2015:- "This matter has engaged the attention of this Court at Lucknow Bench in Service Single No. 5317 of 2010 (Hare Ram Prajapati and another v. State of U.P. & others). In the aforesaid case the Court has directed the State Government to take a decision in respect of the employees who are working under the National Service Scheme. The grievance of the petitioner is that he has worked for more than 41 years but under the said scheme he has not been absorbed and he stood retired. The petitioner is seeking pension in addition to other post retiral benefits as a regular employee. As mentioned above, this Court in the said decision has directed the State Government to take decision in regard to 50 vacancies in the State. The relevant portion of the order dated 2.8.2010 reads as under: "...Learned counsel submits that the petitioners will also be absorbed as against the existing vacancies in accordance with their seniority. The main hurdle in the absorption of the petitioners and similarly situated persons is the ban imposed by the State Government and if regularization/ absorption is to take place, then it has to be take place with the permission of the State Government. The matter has been referred to the State Government in regard to the 50 vacancies but the State Government has not taken any decision up till now and the persons, who are working for more than 20 years are lingering for regularization." Learned Standing Counsel is directed to obtain instructions from the State Government with regard to the said direction. Put up this case on 10 August 2015 in the additional cause list." 3. Consequently, the State has filed the counter affidavit. wherein in paragraph no.5 it has been stated that the State Government has duly considered the whole issue and issued direction to the University. 4. In view of the said circumstances, the respondent no.2 and 3 are directed to consider the claim of the petitioner, in view of the directions issued by the State Government and take appropriate decision and pass appropriate order within a period of two months from today, and communicate the same to the petitioner. 5. Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 3.7.2025 AdityaG Digitally signed by :- ADITYA GAUTAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad