HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (S/S) No. 445of 2025 Smt. Sudha Gupta ...Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and others ….Respondents Present: Ms. Mamta Bisht, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rajeev Singh Bisht, Additional C.S.C. for the State. Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J.(Oral) The petitioner claims that her entire amount of gratuity may be paid to her alongwith the interest. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 3. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the matter is squarely covered by the judgment dated 29.11.2023, passed in WPSS No. 1846 of 2022, Nawal Kishore Verma Vs. State of Uttarakhand and others alongwith connected matters. 4. This fact is admitted by the learned State counsel. 2 5. Since the matter is covered, instant petition is decided in terms of the dated 29.11.2023, passed in WPSS No. 1846 of 2022, Nawal Kishore Verma Vs. State of Uttarakhand and others alongwith connected matters. (Ravindra Maithani, J.) 01.04.2025 Jitendra