Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 45249 (CHH)

HEMSAGAR GUPTA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WA/878/2024 · 2025-01-03

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:282-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WA No. 878 of 2024 Hemsagar Gupta S/o Shri Santosh Gupta Aged About 31 Years R/o H.No. 132, Anand Bhoomi, Jora, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh ... Appellant versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department of Skill Development and Technical Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. Under Secretary Department of Skill Development and Technical Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3. Director Directorate of Employment and Training, Indrawati Bhawan, Block-3, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 4. The Principal Government Co-Ed Polytechnic, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 5. Neha Tiwari Aged About 37 Years Presently Posted As Lecturer Mechanical Government Co-Ed Polytechnic, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ...Respondents For Appellant : Mr. Ghanshyam Kashyap, Advocate. For Respondents/State : Mr. Yashwant Singh Thakur, Additional Advocate General. BRIJMOHAN MORLE Digitally signed by BRIJMOHAN MORLE Date: 2025.01.04 11:08:52 +0530 2 Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal , Judge Judgment on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 03 .0 1 .202 5 1. Heard Mr. Ghanshyam Kashyap, learned counsel for the appellant. Also heard Mr. Yashwant Singh Thakur, learned Additional Advocate General, appearing for the State. 2. The present intra Court appeal has been filed by the appellant against the order dated 23.10.2024 passed by the learned Single Judge in WPS No. 6454 of 2024 (Hemsagar Gupta vs. State of Chhattisgarh & Others), whereby the learned Single Judge has dismissed the writ petition filed by the appellant/writ petitioner herein. 3. Learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present appeal because after filing of the present appeal, the certain developments taken place. 4. Learned State counsel has no objection. 5. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the appellant, the present writ appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Brijmohan