1 2025:CGHC:10610 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONT No. 1445 of 2024 1 - Tarun Birla S/o. Jagdish Birla Aged About 34 Years Presently Posted As Food Safety Officer, O/o. Dy. Director, Food And Drug Administration, Near Bus Stand, Gariyaband (C.G.) 2 - Umesh Kumar Verma S/o Late Shri Room Ram Verma Aged About 35 Years Presently Posted As Food Safety Officer, O/o. Dy. Director, Food And Drug Administration, District Hospital Complex, Infront Of Municipal Corporation, Baloda Bazaar- Bhatapara (C.G.) 3 - Mukesh Kumar Sahu S/o Late Shri Samaru Ram Sahu Aged About 34 Years Presently Posted As Food Safety Officer, O/o. Dy. Director, Food And Drug Administration, Near Kali Mandir, Thakurpara, Kawardha, District - Kabirdham (C.G.) 4 - Akshay Kumar Soni S/o Shri Narendra Kumar Soni Aged About 36 Years Presently Posted As Food Safety Officer, O/o. Dy. Director, Food And Drug Administration, Near District Hospital, Dhamtari (C.G.) 5 - Sushmit Dewangan S/o Shri Hemram Dewangan Aged About 33 Years Presently Posted As Food Safety Officer, O/o. Dy. Director, Food And Drug Administration, Composite Collectorate, Second Floor, Chintlanka, Dantewada (C.G.) 2 ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Manoj Kumar Pingua Commissioner Of Food Safety And Additional Chief Secretary, Health And Family Welfare Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur, (C.G.) 2 - Chandan Kumar Controller, Food And Drug Administration, Indrawati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vedant Shadangi, Advocate For Respondent(s) For Respondent No.2 : : Mr. Vivek Sharma, Additional A.G. Mr. Amiya Bhusan Advocate Hon’ble Shri Arvind Kumar Verma, Judge Order on Board 04.03.2025 1. The instant contempt petition has been filed by the petitioner herein, alleging non-compliance of this Court’s order dated 04.09.2024 passed in WPS No. 5385 of 2024. 2. Learned counsel for respondents presented the copy of communication dated 21.02.2025 through covering memo and submits that order passed by this Court has already been complied with. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the respondent authorities have decided the representation 3 of the petitioners for name-sake only and rejected the same without going on to the merits. 4. The order dated 21.02.2025 presented by the respondents is taken on record. 5. Given the said submission made by the counsel for the respondent and perusing the order dated 21.02.2025, this Court is of view that the order passed by this Court stands complied with. The respondent stand discharged of the contempt proceedings. 6. Accordingly, the contempt petition stands finally disposed of. 7. However, the right of the petitioners would stand reserved to assail the subsequent order passed by the respondents in an appropriate proceeding, if so desires. Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) Judge Saxena ABHIGYA SAXENA Digitally signed by ABHIGYA SAXENA