Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Kerala · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4524 (KER)

DR. JAGADEESWARAN v. NESAMANI

FAO/43/2025 · 2025-04-11

Syam Kumar V M

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

FAO NO. 43 OF 2025 1 2025:KER:32060 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SYAM KUMAR V.M. FRIDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF APRIL 2025/21ST CHAITHRA, 1947 FAO NO. 43 OF 2025 AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 20.02.2025 IN CMA NO.7 OF 2025 OF ASSISTANT SESSIONS COURT/SUB COURT/COMMERCIAL COURT,NEYYATTINKARA ARISING OUT OF THE ORDER IN OS NO.763 OF 2023 OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF COURT ,NEYYATTINKARA APPELLANT/PETITIONER IN I.A. NO.1/2025 IN CMA NO.7/2025/PLAINTIFF IN O.S.NO.763 OF 2023 DR. JAGADEESWARAN AGED 57 YEARS S/O. CHELLAPPAN, NAVANEETHAM HOUSE, THIRUPURATHOORDESOM, THIRUPURAM P.O., THIRUPURAM VILLAGE, NEYYATTINKARA TALUK, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695121 BY ADVS. A.PARVATHI MENON P.SANJAY BIJU MEENATTOOR P.K.MURALYKRISHNAN PAUL VARGHESE (PALLATH) KIRAN NARAYANAN RAHUL RAJ P. MUHAMMED BILAL.V.A MEERA R. MENON RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS IN I.A.NO.1/2025 IN C.M.A. 7/2025/DEFENDANTS IN O.S.NO.763/2023 1 NESAMANI AGED 69 YEARS S/O MARYA MICHEL NADAR, S. R. BHAVAN, VLATHIKKUZHI, VENKADANBUDESOM, KULATHOOR FAO NO. 43 OF 2025 2 2025:KER:32060 VILLAGE, NEYYATTINKARA TALUK, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695121 2 RETNAMMA D/O MARYAMMAL, S. R. BHAVAN, VLATHIKKUZHI, VENKADAMBUDESOM, KULATHOOR VILLAGE, NEYYATTINKARA TALUK, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM., PIN - 695121 3 SOUMYA D/O RETNAMMA, S. R. BHAVAN, VLATHIKKUZHI, VENKADAMBUDESOM, KULATHOOR VILLAGE, NEYYATTINKARA TALUK, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695121 4 JAGAN RAJ S/O JOHN ROSE, S. R. BHAVAN, VLATHIKKUZHI, VENKADAMBUDESOM, KULATHOOR VILLAGE, NEYYATTINKARA TALUK, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695121 BY ADVS. G.SUDHEER-R1 TO R4 R.HARIKRISHNAN (H-308)(K/000642/2013) THIS FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDERS HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11.04.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: FAO NO. 43 OF 2025 3 2025:KER:32060 J U D G M E N T ============= The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a memo has already been filed seeking permission to withdraw this appeal with liberty to initiate appropriate action. Permission granted. The FAO is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- SYAM KUMAR V.M. JUDGE smm