IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI WEDNESDAY ,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE •jif % PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO LA No.1 of 2012 IN/AND FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO: 50 OF 2025 FAMILY COURT APPEAL IFCA) NO: 50 OF 2()9fi Appeal under section 19 of Family Court Act, against the order dated 31.10.2011 in F.C.O.P No. 60/2009 on the file of the Court of the Judge, Family Court, Kurnool. Between; 1. Laxmi Prasanna, W/o Bharat Kumar Reddy, aged about 27 years, Housewife, R/o P.Lingapuram Village, Jupadu Bunglow Mandal, Kurnool District 2. G. Srinivasa Reddy, aged about 52 years. Agriculture, R/o P.Lingapuram Village, Jupadu Bunglow Mandal, Kurnool District ...Appellants/Respondents AND Bharath Kumar Reddy, S/o Late Rajendra Reddy, aged about 27 years Agriculture, R/o Sukesula Village, Kurnool Mandal and District ...Respondent/Petitioner I.A No.1 of 2012 Petition under Section 5 of Limitation Act, praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of 1 day in filing this appeal. Counsel for the Appellant: Sri. Karri Murali Krishna Counsel for the Respondents:- The Court made the following: APHC011509632011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO I.A. No.1 of 2012 IN/AND FAMILY COURT APPEAL No.50 of 2025 [3526] Between: 1. Laxmi Prasanna, W/o.Bharath Kumar Reddy, Aged about 27 Housewife, R/o.P.Lingapuram Village, Jupadu Bunglow Mandal Kurnool District. years, 2. G. Srinivasa Reddy, Aged about 52 . years, Agriculture, K/o.P.Lingampuram Village, Jupadu Bunglow Mandal, Kurnool District. ... Appellants AND Bharath Kumar Reddy, S/o.Late Rajendra Kumar Reddy, Aged about 27 years, Agriculture, R/o.Sunkesula Village, Kurnool Mandal and District. ... Respondent Counsel for the Appellants: 1. KARRI MURALI KRISHNA Counsel for the Respondent: 1. The Court made the following JUDGMENT: (perNJS.J) Considering the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the I.A. No.1 of 2012, the delay of one (1) day in filing the appeal is condoned. 2. The learned counsel for the appellants, on instructions, submits that subsequent to filing of the present appeal, the matter was amicably settled and in view of the same nothing survives for adjudication. 2. Recording the said submission, the Family Court Appeal is dismissed. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- S.V.S.R.MURTHY JOINT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Judge, Family Court, Kurnool, Kurnool District 2. One CC to Sri. Karri Murali Krishna Advocate [OPUC] 3. Three CD Copies Stu vna HIGH COURT DATED: 16/04/2025 JUDGMENT FCA.No.50 of 2025 DISMISSING THE FAMILY COURT APPEAL