[2025:RJ-JP:13056] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3956/2025 Rajvir Singh S/o Sardar Singh, Aged About 62 Years, R/o Plot No. 39/b, Balmandir Colony, Mantown, Sawai Madhopur, Ra- jasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary Depart- ment Of Revenue, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Deputy Secretary, Department Of Administrative Re- forms (Group-3), Secretariat, Jaipur. 3. The District Collector, Bundi, District Bundi. 4. The Sub Divisional Magistrate, Lakheri, District Bundi, Ra- jasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : None present JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 24/03/2025 1. By way of filing this writ petition, the petitioner is seeking direction against the respondents for providing him notional se- niority, pay fixation and other service benefits. 2. It appears that before approaching this Court, a representa- tion was submitted by the petitioner in the Office of the respon- dents, but the same has not been decided. 3. This Court in the case of Pawan Meena Versus State of Rajasthan in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1665/2024 decided on 02.02.2024 had issued general directions to all the depart- [2025:RJ-JP:13056] (2 of 2) [CW-3956/2025] ments of the State that whenever any representation is submitted by any aggrieved person, the concerned department would look into the matter and decide the same as early as possible. 4. Considering the above factual aspect of the matter and look- ing to the fact that the representation submitted by the petitioner has not been decided by the respondents for the reasons best known to them. 5. In view of the above, the instant writ petition stands dis- posed of with direction to the respondents to decide the represen- tation of the petitioner, in the light of the judgment passed by this Court in the case of Pawan Meena (supra), as early as possible, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. 6. Before parting with this order, it is made clear that this Court has not issued any direction or order to the respondents to decide the representation in a particular way. The respondents would be at liberty to decide the same, strictly in accordance with law. 7. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Aayush Sharma /3