Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 45232 (RAJ)

RAVINDRA KUMAR MOURYA S/O RAMESH CHAND MOURYA v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/17671/2025 · 2025-11-19

Ashok Kumar Jain

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:46772] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17671/2025 1. Ravindra Kumar Mourya S/o Ramesh Chand Mourya, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Vpo Babariya, Tehsil Bansur, District Kotputli- Behror, Rajasthan 2. Sandeep Kumar Jwala S/o Girdhari Lal Verma, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Vpo Mundawara, Tehsil Narayanpur, District Kotputli- Behror, Rajasthan ----Petitioners Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, School Education Department, Govt. Secretariat, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. The Director, Elementary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner. 3. The District Education Officer (Elementary Education), Headquarter, Kotputli- Behror. 4. The District Education Officer (Elementary Education), Headquarter, Khairthal- Tijara. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 19/11/2025 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioners with the following prayer:- “by issuance of an appropriate writ, order or direction, Respondents may kindly be directed to change the place of posting of petitioners from District Khairthal-Tijara to District Kotputli Behror on the post of Teacher Gr. III Level I. [2025:RJ-JP:46772] (2 of 3) [CW-17671/2025] ii. by issuance of an appropriate writ, order or direction, Respondents may kindly be directed to decide the representation and thereby given posting to the petitioners in District Kotputli Behror as after creation of new district Khairthal-Tijara the working district of petitioners comes under Kharithal Tijara whereas the petitioners are resident of Kotputli Behror. iii) Any other order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit, just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may also be passed in favour of the Petitioners.” 2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioners submits that the petitioners may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents- Authority to consider and resolve his grievances. 3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioners are given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to decide the representation with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After passing the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioners either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioners have provided E-mail in their representation. If the petitioners are still aggrieved, they have a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. [2025:RJ-JP:46772] (3 of 3) [CW-17671/2025] 4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /37