Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4523 (RAJ)

YOGESH KUMAR S/O SH. TARACHAND v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CCP/102/2024 · 2025-08-25

Avneesh Jhingan, Baljinder Singh Sandhu

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:33462-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 102/2024 Yogesh Kumar S/o Sh. Tarachand Father/o Tarachand, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Dhobi Ghat, Ward No. 1, Khetri, District- Jhunjhunu (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Chief Secretary, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur 2. Shri Sudhanshu Pant, Chief Secretary, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.) 3. Shri Rishidev Ola, Ceo, Nagar Palika, Khetri, Dist. Jhunjhunu (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Brahma Prakash For Respondent(s) : Mr.G.S.Gill, AAG with Mr.Manoj Kumar HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU Order 25/08/2025 1. This contempt petition is filed pleading willful disobedience of the order dated 09.05.2023 passed by this Court, wherein following directions were given:- “4. If the allegations of encroachments have been levelled, respondent No.4 is required to examine the complaint, hold enquiry and find out whether the complaint regarding encroachment is correct or not. Upon collection of factual report, if it is found that there are encroachments made on the land recorded as Gair Mumkin Nala Khasra No.4018/2477 stated [2025:RJ-JP:33462-DB] (2 of 2) [CCP-102/2024] in the writ petition, appropriate actions are required to be taken. 5. Chief Executive Officer, Nagar Palika Khetri shall undertake an enquiry and conclude the same one way or the other within a period of 3 months. After conducting enquiry, appropriate steps, if necessary, shall be taken. 6. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed off.” 2. The respondents have filed reply attaching mauka fard report dated 12.09.2024, wherein it is claimed that the encroachments on Khasra Nos.4018/2477, 2476 & 2471 of Nagar Palika, Khetri have been removed. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the representation dated 19.09.2024 was sent through post agitating that the entire encroachments have not been removed. 4. The contempt petition is disposed of with direction to the Nagar Palika, Khetri to consider and decide the representation filed by the petitioner within three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. 5. The petitioner shall be at liberty to avail remedies in accordance with law, if aggrieved of the decision. (BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU),J (AVNEESH JHINGAN),J Monika/2