RANVEER SINGH @ RANNO S/O BANAY SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/14436/2025 · 2025-11-07
Sameer Jain
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 45222 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 45222 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:44798] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14436/2025 Ranveer Singh @ Ranno S/o Banay Singh, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Nugla Patti, Police Station Ucchain, District Bharatpur (Raj.). (At Present Confined In District Jail, Sewar). ----Accused-Applicant Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Non-Applicant For Applicant(s) : Mr. Kapil Nagayach For Non-Applicant(s) : Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP Ms. Arti Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Judgment 07/11/2025
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicant. The accused-applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No. 170/2025 registered at Police Station Uchhain, District Bharatpur for the offence(s) under Section 8/20 of the NDPS Act.
2.
Learned counsel for the accused-applicant has submitted that applicant is a sole bread earner of the family, and is aged approximately 34 years. It is further submitted that the contraband that is alleged to be recovered does not fall under the ambit of the named contraband i.e. ganja. It is further submitted that the quantity recovered is much lesser and one-tenth of the commercial quantity i.e., 20 kg. It is further submitted that there exists no antecedent of similar nature against the applicant.
[2025:RJ-JP:44798] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-14436/2025]
3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the instant bail application.
4. Having heard the submissions advanced by the counsel for the parties and considering that the applicant is a sole bread earner of the family, aged 34 years; that quantity recovered is one-tenth of the commercial quantity; that there exists no antecedent of similar nature against the applicant and looking upon the overall facts, and without commenting upon the merits/demerits of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the accused-applicant on bail.
5. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that accused-applicant Ranveer Singh @ Ranno S/o Banay Singh shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so.
(SAMEER JAIN),J DEEPAK/s-370