[2025:RJ-JP:51476] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19833/2025 Aruna Rajput D/o Shri Ramcharan Rajpoot, Wife Of Mahesh Thakur, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Opposite Water Works, Subhash Nagar Colony, Behind Narayan Hospital District Dholpur, Rajasthan-328001 ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Chief Secretary, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan) 2. Secretary, Department Of Medical And Health, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan) 3. The Director, Medical Health And Family-Welfare Department, Tilak Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur (Rajasthan) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Govind Upadhyay For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 18/12/2025 1. Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioner with following prayer: “i) By an appropriate writ, order and direction, 2011 respondents may be directed to count theservice of petitioner w.e.f. 24-01-2000 for the purpose of pension, gratuity, seniority, Selection grade, promotion, commutation of leave and to grant all benefits (financial sotherwise) which the petitioner is entitled to get on basis of counting his services w.e.f. 24-01-2000. ii) By an appropriate writ, order and direction the [2025:RJ-JP:51476] (2 of 3) [CW-19833/2025] order dated 13-08-2009 fixing his at remuneration of Rs. 10,000, may kindly be declared illegal and be quashed to the extent.” 2. Learned counsel for petitioner while referring and relying upon judgment dated 21.03.2017 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.18268/2016 titled as Firoj Arif Vs. State of Rajasthan submits that the controversy and the issue raised herein is already settled by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Hon’ble Court. He further submitted that instant writ petition be disposed of in accordance with aforesaid order. 3. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for petitioner and also material placed on record, the writ petition may be disposed in light of Firoj Arif Vs. State of Rajasthan (supra). 4. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation in light of ratio laid down in case of Firoj Arif Vs. State of Rajasthan (supra), but in case of deviation with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the order to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in her representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, she has a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. [2025:RJ-JP:51476] (3 of 3) [CW-19833/2025] 5. Needless to say that if ratio is applicable upon facts of the case as claimed by the petitioner, then same benefits be extended. 6. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /169