Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 45219 (ALL)

MAHESH KUMAR SRIVASTAVA v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIA/5090/2025 · 2025-04-21

Ajit Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:60574 Court No. - 4 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 5090 of 2025 Petitioner :- Mahesh Kumar Srivastava Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Omkar Nath Rai,Vinay Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution petitioner has prayed for following substantial relief:- "Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no. 3-District Magistrate, District Ghazipur to consider and decide the letter dated 03.03.2023 send by respondent no. 2-Secretary Board of Revenue Uttar Pradesh Anubhag-4, Lucknow for grant the medical claim of petitioner amounting to Rs. 3,23,858/- within stipulated period so fixed by this Court." 3. Learned Standing Counsel does not have any objection, in the event, petitioner is directed to make a fresh representation in this regard before the respondent no. 3 which may be directed to dispose of by respondent no. 3 within a time bound period. 5. In view of the above, this petition stands disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to file fresh representation before the respondent no. 3 ventilating all his grievance within a period of four weeks' from today and in the event, any such representation is made by the petitioner within the aforesaid period as directed hereinabove, the same shall be considered and disposed of by respondent no. 3 within a further period of two months. Order Date :- 22.4.2025/Shiraz Digitally signed by :- SHIRAZ ALI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad