[2025:RJ-JP:46768] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16664/2025 1. Reshpal Saini S/o Dhan Singh Saini, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Vpo Rambas, Tehsil Govindgarh, District Alwar, Rajasthan. 2. Rajendra Singh S/o Sobhag Chand, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Village Loharana, Post Chosla, Tehsil Nawa City, District Didwana- Kuchaman, Rajasthan 3. Girraj Prasad Meena S/o Pyare Lal Meena, Aged About 41 Years, R/o Village Manema, Post Katkar, Tehsil Hindaun, District Karauli, Rajasthan 4. Mool Chand Mahariya S/o Mohan Lal Mahariya, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Vpo Hod, Tehsil Khandela, District Sikar, Rajasthan 5. Madan Lal Raigar S/o Chhaju Ram Raigar, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Village Meghpura, Post Kanwat, Tehsil Khandela, District Sikar, Rajasthan 6. Ashok Prajapat S/o Ramji Lal Prajapat, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Vpo Naurangwara, Tehsil Mahawa, District Dausa, Rajasthan 7. Prakash Chandra Meena S/o Salaga Ram Meena, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Vpo Booj, Tehsil Jamwaramgarh, District Jaipur, Rajasthan 8. Ramakant Khinchi S/o Phool Chand Khinchi, Aged About 41 Years, R/o Subhash Nagar, Ward No. 23, Fatehpur Shekhawati District Sikar, Rajasthan 9. Vinit Kumar S/o Vinod Kumar, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Vpo Kairu, Tehsil Nawalgarh, District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan. 10. Anita Khandelwal D/o Rambabu, Aged About 41 Years, R/o B-45 A, Green Park Colony, Behind Rajesh Coach, Agra Road, Jaipur. ----Petitioners Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Education Secretary, Govt. Secretariat, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. The Director (Secondary Education), Bikaner. [2025:RJ-JP:46768] (2 of 3) [CW-16664/2025] 3. Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Through Its Secretary, Ajmer. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manoj Sharma, AAG with Mr. Vishal Kumar Mr. M.F. Baig HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 19/11/2025 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioners with the following prayer:- “It is therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble court may very graciously be pleased to accept and allow this writ petition and further be pleased to: I) By an appropriate writ, order and direction, the impugned seniority List dated 17.11.2022 (Annex.7) for the post of Lecturer (School Education) may kindly be quashed and set aside. ii) By further appropriate writ, order and direction, the respondents be directed to issue fresh seniority list by including the name of Petitioners on the post of Lecturer, Physics, Biology and Commerce after assigning them seniority against the year 2016-17 and thereafter they may be further promoted on the post of vice Principal as per their seniority. (iii) Any other order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit, just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may [2025:RJ-JP:46768] (3 of 3) [CW-16664/2025] also be passed in favour of the Petitioners. iv) Cost of the writ petition be also awarded in favour of the Petitioners.” 2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioners submits that the petitioners may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents- Authority to consider and resolve his grievances. 3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioners are given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to decide the representation with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After passing the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioners either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioners have provided E-mail in their representation. If the petitioners are still aggrieved, they have a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /366