Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
$~47 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 180/2025
MITHUN SARKAR
.....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Ashish Negi, Adv. versus
GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents
Through: Mr. Yasir Rauf Anasari, ASC Mr. Surya Kumar, Judicial Asst./Litigation Branch, Shahdara District, Karkardooma District Courts Ms. Priyanka Rawal, Judicial Asst./Litigation Branch, Shahdara District, Karkardooma District Courts SI Sanjay Bansal, PS Bhajanpura
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH
O R D E R %
05.03.2025
CRL.M.A. 6725/2025
1. This is an application seeking directions to the concerned Ahlmad Court/Record Keeper/Computer Branch of Shahdara District, Karkardooma District Courts for correcting the online e-court record and replace Section 359 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (<IPC=) with Sections 498A, 406 and 34 of IPC in CR Case No. 2341/2011 which has been disposed of by the learned CMM, Shahdara District, Karkardooma District Courts. 2. This Court vide the order dated 07.02.2025, disposed of the present writ petition on the statement of Mr. Negi, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, that the issue has been addressed and the record has been corrected. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 00:34:51
3. The present application is filed by the petitioner stating that the FIR No. 16/2010 dated 14.01.2010 registered at PS Bhajanpura under Sections 498A, 406 and 34 of IPC and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 (<DPA=) is still available in the archived data of the e-court, even though the same has been quashed. Hence, a notice was issued to respondent Nos. 2 and 3. 4. Ms. Priyanka Rawal, Judicial Assistant appears on behalf of the Litigation Branch, Shahdara District, Karkardooma District Courts and states that the said FIR is not available on the official website of the Shahdara District, Karkardooma District Courts. However, she is unable to comment on the archived data of the e-court. 5. It is an admitted fact that the said FIR has already been quashed by this Court in Crl.M.C. No. 1434/2011 vide the order dated
04.05.2011. Thus, the said FIR is wrongly available in the archived data of the e-court. 6.
For the said reasons, it is ordered that FIR No. 16/2010 dated 14.01.2010 registered at PS Bhajanpura under Sections 498A, 406 and 34 of IPC and Section 4 of DPA has been quashed and is wrongly shown in the archived data of the e-court. 7. Dasti. JASMEET SINGH, J
MARCH 5, 2025 / (MS)
Click here to check corrigendum, if any This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 00:34:51