[2025:RJ-JP:42495] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 555/2024 1. Banty Saharan S/o Sh. Rai Singh, Aged About 24 Years, R/o 16, J.N.S, Police Station Faifana, Tehsil Nohar District Hanumangarh (Raj.) At Present Tenant House No. 22, Shiva Colony, Tonk Phatak, Jaipur (Raj.) 2. Yaman S/o Sh. Satpal Singh, Aged About 22 Years, R/o 16, J.N.S., Police Station Faifana, Tehsil Nohar District Hanumangarh (Raj.) At Present Tenant House No. 34, Kidwai Nagar, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Accused/Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent 2. Sangita W/o Shrawan Ram Vishnoi, R/o Purani Chungi Chowki, Gajner Road, Nayashahar, Bikaner (Raj.) ----Complainant/Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mukesh Dudi For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP Mr. Deepak Verma for Mr. Vishal Kumar HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL Order 16/10/2025 Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted a copy of the compromise deed dated 09.11.2023 executed between the parties which is taken on record. This criminal miscellaneous petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for quashing the FIR No.0487 dated 25.10.2023 lodged by the respondent no.2/complainant (for brevity, ‘the complainant’) against the petitioners and co-accused persons at Police Station Vidhyadhar Nagar, District-Jaipur City (South) for the offence under Sections 420, 406, 120-B of IPC and Sections 4 and 5 of Prize Chits and Money [2025:RJ-JP:42495] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-555/2024] Circulation (Banning) Act, 1978 and Sections of 3 and 21 of Banning of Unregulated Deposit Schemes Act, 2019. Learned counsel for the petitioners, inviting attention of this Court towards the compromise deed dated 09.11.2023 (Annexure-2), would submit that the private dispute of civil nature, the genesis of the aforesaid FIR, has amicably been settled between the parties. He, therefore, prays that the criminal miscellaneous petition be allowed. The complainant-Smt. Sangita, present in person and identified by her learned counsel, acknowledging the contents of the compromise deed dated 09.11.2023 submits that she has no objection if the criminal miscellaneous petition is allowed and the FIR is quashed. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the prayer. Heard. Considered. Taking into consideration the contentions advanced at Bar, the dispute being private and of civil nature, the contents of the compromise deed dated 09.11.2023, the statement made by the complainant and the law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in the case of Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab and Others: (2012) 10 SCC 303, this Court deems it just and proper to allow this criminal miscellaneous petition. Accordingly, this criminal miscellaneous petition is allowed. The FIR No.0487 dated 25.10.2023 registered at Police Station Vidhyadhar Nagar, District-Jaipur City (South) is quashed and set aside qua the petitioners. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of accordingly. (MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J Tahir/133