IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAV^i^^^^^^ a MONDAY THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE ■I m ' S / ,U' • ' PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 975 OF 2025 Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents herein read with Article 215 of the Constitution of India for wiltful and deliberate violation of the Orders dated 15-11-2024 passed in W.P.No. 26158 of 2024 of this Hon’ble Court Between: Uyyuru Phaneendra Reddy, S/o. Late. Nagireddy Aged about 40 years, Occ Business R/o. H.No4-63, Nidamarru Village, Mangalagiri Mandal, Guntur District. ...PETITIONER AND 1. S. Satish Kumar, S/o. Not known to the petitioner The Superintendent of Police At Guntur Guntur District. 2. Mr. Murali Krishna, S/o. Not known to the petitioner The Dy. Superintendent of Police North Sub Division, At Managalagiri, Guntur District. 3. Y.Srinivasa Rao, S/o. Not known to the petitioner The Station House Officer Mangalagiri Rurual P.S. Guntur District. ...C0NTEMN0R3 Counsel for the Petitioner :SRI. MOHAMMAD GHALIB SHAHID Counsel for the Respondents: The Court made the following: 1 -^PHC010189162025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 975/2025 Between; ...PETITIONER Uyyuru Phaneendra Reddy AND ...CONTEMNOR(S) S Satish Kumar and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.MOHAMMAD GHALIB SHAHID Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. The Court made the following: 2 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA . CONTEMPT CASE NO: 975 of 2025 ORDER: Heard Sri Md. Ghalib Shahid, learned counsel on behalf of the petitioner. Learned Counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner intends to withdraw the Contempt since the matter is settled and he has compromised in the issue. Learned Counsel would further submit that they have filed memo to that effect. Recording the same, permission may be accorded to withdraw the contempt. 2. Permission is accorded. Considering the submissions made by the learned Counsel for the petitioner, the Contempt Case is dismissed as withdrawn since nothing survives in this matter as the matter is settled between the parties. No order 3. as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/-K.TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. S. Satish Kumar, S/o. Not known to the petitioner The Superintendent of Police At Guntur Guntur District. 2. Mr. Murali Krishna, S/o. Not known to the petitioner The Dy. of Poiice North Sub Division, At Managalagiri, Guntur Superintendent District. ■ 3. Y.Srinivasa Rao, S/o. Not known to the petitioner The Station House Officer Mangalagiri Rurual P.S. Guntur District. 4. One CC to Sri. Mohammad Ghalib Shahid Advocate [OPUC] 5. Three CD Copies ‘ V f V * i J * f ' HIGH COURT DATED :21/04/2025 ORDER X 11 SEP 2125 ^ Current Section ^ CC.No.975 of 2025 mi CONTEMPT CASE IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN