DYAMANNA S/O HANAMANTHAPPA DOLLIN v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
WP/103389/2023 · 2025-04-08
M G Uma
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 45202 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 45202 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:6243 WP No. 103389 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M.G.UMA WRIT PETITION NO. 103389 OF 2023 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN:
DYAMANNA S/O. HANAMANTHAPPA DOLLIN AGE. 50 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. KOPPAL, TQ. KOPPAL, DIST. KOPPAL – 583231. …PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B. V. SOMAPUR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA R/BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT, VIDHAN SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560001.
2.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, KOPPAL, DIST. KOPPAL-583231.
3.
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER KOPPAL, DIST. KOPPAL-583231.
4.
THE TAHASHILDAR KOPPAL, DIST. KOPPAL-583231
5.
REVENUE INSPECTOR KOPPAL, DIST. KOPPAL-583231.
Digitally signed by V N BADIGER Location:
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH, DHARWAD
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:6243 WP No. 103389 of 2023
6.
VILLAGE ACCOUNTANT KOPPAL, DIST. KOPPAL-583231.
7. DEVENDRAPPA S/O. VIRUPAKSHAPPA BADIGER AGE. 65, OCC. CARPENTER, R/O. GOURIANGALA ONI, KOPPAL, TQ. KOPPAL, DIST. KOPPAL-583231. …RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. T. HANUMAREDDY, AGA R1 TO R6;
SRI. SAGAN HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R7)
------
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE WRIT OF CERTIORARI QUASHING/SETTING ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO. 2, IN NO.KAM/APPEAL/40/2022-23 DATED 19/01/2023 VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND
ORDER PASSED BY RESPONDENT NO. 3 IN NO.REVENUE/APPEAL/257/2021-22 DATED 29/07/2022 VIDE ANNEXURE-B AND THE ORDER PASSED BY RESPONDENT NO. 4 IN NO.REV.RRT/48/2021-22 DATED 12/01/2022 VIDE ANNEXURE-C.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:6243 WP No. 103389 of 2023
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M.G.UMA
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed memo seeking permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to approach the respondents for mutation of names in the revenue records after disposal of the matter before the Land Tribunal, Koppal.
Memo is placed on record.
In view of the memo, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as sought for, in accordance with law.
Sd/- (M.G.UMA) JUDGE
MKM CT:ANB List No.: 2 Sl No.: 2