[2025:RJ-JP:47674] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15352/2025 Harshita Bhati D/o Late Shri Dharmaram Bhati, Aged About 35 Years, R/o 113/97, Pratap Nagar, Sector-11, Sanganer, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Urban Development And Housing, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Rajasthan Housing Board, Through Its Commissioner, Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vishal Kumar for Mr. Manoj Sharma, AAG Ms. Previshika Singh for Mr. V.D. Gathala, AGC Mr. M.F Baig HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 25/11/2025 1. Ms. Praveshika Singh, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of Mr. V.D. Gathala accepts notice for respondent no.1. 2. Mr. M.F Baig accepts notice for Rajasthan Housing Board. 3. Office is directed to reflect name of Mr. V.D. Gathala, Advocate and Mr. M.F. Baig as counsel for respondent(s). 4. Learned counsel for petitioner is directed to supply a copy of writ petition to learned counsel for respondent(s). 5. Instant writ petition is filed by petitioner with following prayer: [2025:RJ-JP:47674] (2 of 3) [CW-15352/2025] “It is therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble court may very graciously be pleased to accept and allow this writ petition and further be pleased to: i) Issue an appropriate writ order or direction in the nature thereof thereby the impugned order dated 04.04.2025 (Anx.4) may kindly be quashed and set aside and the respondents may be directed to give appointment to the petitioner on the compassionate ground on the post of Junior Assistant as per provision of Rules of 1996. ii) Issue an appropriate writ order or direction in the nature thereof thereby the action of the respondents denial of compassionate appointment to the petitioner may kindly be declared illegal and same be struck down by which they have denied to give appointment to the petitioner on compassionate ground. iii) Pass any other appropriate order which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit, just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case in favour of the petitioner. iv) Cost of the writ petition be also awarded in favour of the petitioner.” 6. During course of argument, learned counsel for respondent(s) suggests that the petitioner may file a representation and same shall be considered in light of legal position. 7. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents- Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation after enquiry about grievances, raised by the petitioner but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the [2025:RJ-JP:47674] (3 of 3) [CW-15352/2025] decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in her representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, she is at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /17