121 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-20024-2025 Date of Decision:- 22.05.2025 Ashok ....Petitioner Vs. State of Haryana and Ors. ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE AMARJOT BHATTI Present: Mr. Sant Lal Barwala, Advocate for petitioner. Ms. Ambika Sood, Addl. A.G., Haryana. **** AMARJOT BHATTI, J. (Oral) 1. Petitioner filed second petition under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for quashing of FIR No.0187 dated 03.06.2023, under Sections 328, 376(2) (n), 494, 495 of IPC (Section 66 of Information Technology Act was added later on) and Section 6 of POCSO Act, registered at Police Station Urban Estate Rohtak, District Rohtak (Annexure P-1) and subsequent proceedings arising therefrom. 2. Notice of motion. 3. On advance notice, Ms. Ambika Sood, Addl. A.G., Haryana appears and accepts notice on behalf of State. She informed that in the case in hand, challan was presented on 10.07.2024 and the charges were framed on 25.07.2024 and till date out of total 19 prosecution witnesses, 06 prosecution witnesses have been examined. Sunil Devi 2025.05.23 16:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-20024-2025 -2- 4. At this stage, learned counsel for petitioner states that he has instructions to withdraw the present petition and accordingly withdraws the same with liberty to seek appropriate remedy as per law. 5. In view of the statement, present petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. 6. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand disposed of accordingly as well. (AMARJOT BHATTI) JUDGE 22.05.2025 Sunil devi Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No Sunil Devi 2025.05.23 16:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document