Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 45195 (BOM)

VIJAY S/O DIGAMBER FALKE AND OTHER v. SHAKUNTALA WD/O PANJABRAO DAFALE AND OTHERS

CAC/7/2025 · 2025-07-17

Vrushali V Joshi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 / 2 17.cra42.2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION (CAC) NO. 07 OF 2025 IN CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 42 OF 2023 Vijay s/o Digamber Falke and anr. Vs. Shakuntala wd/o Panjabrao Dafale and ors. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's Orders. or directions and Registrar's orders. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. S.S. Sohoni, Advocate for applicants. Ms. S.J. Banerjee, Advocate for non-applicant Nos.1, 2 & 4. Ms. Mrunal Naik, Advocate for non-applicant Nos.8 & 9. CORAM : MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J. DATE : 17.07.2025. The applicants have filed this application to delete the names of non-applicant No.6 and 7 as they are defendants in civil suit and not contesting parties. They are not served in civil suit also. 2. Learned counsel for the non-applicant Nos.1, 2 and 4 has no objection for deleting the names. As the non-applicant Nos.6 & 7 are formal parties and were not served in civil suit also, the non-applicant No.7 is expired and non-applicant No.3 is the original plaintiff. Prity 2 / 2 17.cra42.2023 3. Applicants seeks time to take steps to bring the legal representatives of non-applicant No.3 on record within a period of one week. 4. The civil application is allowed. 5. The names of non-applicant Nos.6 and 7 are permitted to be deleted. 6. Amendment be carried out forthwith. (Mrs. Vrushali V. Joshi, J.) Prity