- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:4565 WP No. 104395 of 2015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 104395 OF 2015 (GM-TEN) BETWEEN: M/S. BIOTICS AND REMEDIES, NO.175/20, BHARATH COMPLEX, A.S.R.CHAR STREET, BENGALURU – 560 053. BY ITS PROPRIETOR, SHRI DHANARAJ, AGE: 58 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, …PETITIONER (ABSENT) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, BY ITS SECRETARY, HEALTH AND MEDICAL SCIENCE, VIKAS SOUDHA, BENGALURU. 2. KARNATAKA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, HUBBALLI, BY ITS DIRECTOR. 3. KARNATAKA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, HUBBALLI, BY ITS C.E.O. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. PRAVEEN.K.UPPAR., AGA FOR R1; SRI. GOPAL.B.PATIL., ADVOCATE FOR R2-3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:4565 WP No. 104395 of 2015 THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER The captioned Writ Petition is listed today for orders regarding report of the Court notice by the City Civil Court, Bengaluru in respect of the petitioner. A perusal of the daily order sheet reflects that the petitioner was represented by Counsel Sri.Mahantesh C.Kotturshettar. The petition was listed on 30.07.2024, on that day, taking note of the submission made by AGA that the counsel on record for the petitioner is no more, this Court, issued Court notice to the petitioner. The Court notice was issued to the petitioner through City Civil Court, Bengaluru and the report of the same is received by the Registry of the High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench on 21.01.2025 and the opinion of the Judge was door locked. The petitioner’s name is printed/ shown in the cause list. The Name of the petitioner is called out thrice in the open Court there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, either personally or through video conferencing. The petitioner is absent. The petitioner has not engaged any counsel. As could - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:4565 WP No. 104395 of 2015 be seen from the writ papers, the petition is filed in the year 2015. Now we are in the month of March 2025. The petition is pending from ten years. As already noted above, the name of the petitioner is called out thrice in the open Court, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, either personally or through video conferencing. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE CLK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 31