CRM-M-19996-2025 -1- 210 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-19996-2025 Date of Decision:07.07.2025 Jyoti Sagoo …Petitioner vs. State of Punjab …Respondent Coram : Hon’ble Mr. Justice N.S.Shekhawat Present : Mr. Avtar S. Khinda, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. I.P.S. Sabharwal, DAG, Punjab. *** N.S.Shekhawat J. (Oral) 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 482 of B.N.S.S with a prayer to grant anticipatory bail to her in case FIR No.05, dated 23.03.2024, under Sections 448, 380, 201, 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, 120-B of IPC registered at Police Station NRI Kapurthala, District Kapurthala (Annexure P-1). 2. While granting the concession of interim anticipatory bail by this Court on 09.04.2025, this Court had noticed the following contentions raised by learned counsel for the petitioner:- “As per the allegations levelled by the complainant, petitioner and her husband namely Dalwinder Singh had taken unauthorised pos- session, after breaking the locks of the house of the complainant and had stolen a bed from the house. Learned counsel further con- tends that the petitioner had already vacated the premises on 07.06.2023 and is not in possession of the house in question. He further contends that the petitioner is not even a signatory to the alleged rent agreement dated 03.01.2017 (Annexure P-2). He HEMLATA 2025.07.07 23:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-19996-2025 -2- further contends that the custodial interrogation of the petitioner may not be required in the peculiar facts and circumstances of the present case.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has reiterated the submissions and further submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation and her custodial interrogation may not be required. 4. On the other hand, learned State counsel also submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation and is no longer required for further investigation. 5. In view of the above statement made by learned counsel for the parties, the interim order dated 09.04.2025 is made absolute. The petitioner shall continue to join the investigation, as and when called by the Investigating Officer. The petitioner shall also abide by the conditions as specified under Section 482 (2) of B.N.S.S. 6. Pending application(s) stand(s) also disposed of. (N.S.SHEKHAWAT) 07.07.2025 JUDGE hemlata Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No HEMLATA 2025.07.07 23:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document