Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 45185 (AP)

M.Venkata Lakshmi v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/8316/2018 · 2025-03-25

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF MARG^ TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE o PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 8316 OF 2018 Between: M.Venkata Lakshmi, W/o Srinivas, aged about 47 years, R/o D.No.5-19, Rajayyapeta Village, Addaripeta Post, Payakaraopeta Mandal, Visakhapatnam District ...Petitioner AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Women Development and Child Welfare Department, Secretariat Building, Velagapudi, Guntur District. The Projector Director, Women Child Welfare Office, MVP Colony, Visakhapatnam. The Child Development Officer, ICDS, Nakkapaili, Visakhapatnam District. 1. 2. 3. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in not appointing the petitioner as Supervisor AAW inspite of selected under BCB category in the written test conducted on 27.10.2013 may one with Hall Ticket No. 133424 and the 3rd salaries to the petitioner from October, 2009 to December, 2010 is illegal, arbitrary and in violation of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to appoint the Supervisor AAW with all consequential benefits. lA NO: 1 OF 2ni« respondent failed to pay the petitioner as Petition under Section 151 CPC stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3rd respondent to pay the salaries to the petitioner for the period October, 2009 to December praying that in the circumstances 2010 pending disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. V V N NARAYANA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR WOMEN DEV The Court made the following order: RAO CHILD WELFARE APHC010190702018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 8316/2018 Between: M.Venkata Lakshmi ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.VVN NARAYANARAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR WOMEN DEV CHILD WELFARE(AP) ...RESPONDENT(S) The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioner seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: .... to issue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2"'’ respondent in not appointing the petitioner as Supervisor AAW in spite of selected under BCB category in the written test conducted on 27.10.2013 with Hall Ticket No.133424 and the 3^^^ respondent failed to pay the salaries to the petitioner from October 2009 to December 2010 is illegal, arbitrary and in violation of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India and consequently, direct the 2 respondent to appoint the petitioner as Supervisor AAW with all consequential benefits." nd 2. Heard Sri V.V.N.Narayana Rao, learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Women and Child Welfare appearing for respondents. Perused the material on record. 2 3. Leaned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that the joined as Anganwadi Worker at Korlayyapeta in the month of August, 2002 under the jurisdiction of respondent No.3. Learned counsel would further submit^ Petitioner that during the pendency of this Writ Petition, now the Petitioner has become as Anganwadi Supervisor. On instructions, learned Petitioner is restricting her prayer to direct the counsel submits that the respondent authorities for payment of salary to her for the period from October, 2009 to December, 2010. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader would submit that the Petitioner IS a regular absconder and that her request for payment of salary from October, 2009 to December, 2010 cannot be entertained and requested for dismissal the Writ Petition. of 5. At this juncture, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that Petitioner worked as Anganwadi Worker from October, 2009 to December, 2010 without there being any reason. Even there is no order of removal of the petitioner or any Show-Cause notice was issued to the petitioner. Despite, the Petitioner sought for certain information under Right to Information from office of respondents 2 and 3, no information was received so far.Finally, learned counsel prays that a direction may be given to respondent No.3 to verify relevant records as to the Petitioner attended duty for the relevant period October, 2009 to December, 2010 and grant salary accordingly. 6. Considering the submissions, it is apposite to direct respondent No.3 verify the relevant records personally with regard to the attendance the i.e., from to of the Petitioner as Anganwadi Worker during the relevant period i.e., from October, 3 2009 to December, 2010 and grant salary to the Petitioner for the said relevant period. In case, the respondent authorities find that the petitioner failed to attend duty for the relevant period, communicate the said fact .to her, accordingly. 7. With the above direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed Sd/-U. SRIDB^ assistant registrar SECTION OFFICER f //TRUE COPY// To 1. The Principal Secretary, Women Development and Child Welfare Department, State of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat Building, Velagapudi Guntur District. 2. The Projector Director, Women Child Welfare Office, MVP Colony, Visakhapatnam. 3. The Child Development Officer, ICDS, Nakkapalli, Visakhapatnam District. 4. One CC to Sri. V V N Narayana Rao Advocate [OPUC] 5. Two CCs to GP for Women Dev Child Welfare, High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 6. Three CD Copies GSC HIGH COURT DATED:26/03/2025 ORDER WP.No.8316 of 2018 DISPOSING THE WP WITHOUT COSTS