IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 41101 OF 2022 i O -17/• v: Between: A. Jayamma, W/o. Late Ediga Muthyalappa @ A. Muthyala Gowd, Aged years, R/o. 3-23, Main Road, Chennekothapalle Village and Mandal, Sri Satyasai District. 71 ...PETITIONER AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Principal Secretary. Revenue Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 2. The District Collector, Puttaparthy, Sri Satya Sai District, 3. The Tahasildar, C.K. Palli Village and Mandal, Sri Satya Sai District. 4. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Dharmavaram 5. The Village Revenue Officer. C.K. Palli Village and Mandal, Sri Satya Sai District. 6. The Mandal Surveyor, C.K. Palli Village and Mandal, Sri Satya Sai District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court be pleased to issue may a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the Respondents No. 2 to 6 in trying to disposses the Petitioner from the land extent of Ac. 1.00 cents in sy. 259-1 situated at Chennakottapalli village and mandal, Sri Satyasai District without following due process of law as arbitrary, illegal, violation of principles of natural justice and also violation of Article 14, 19, 21 and 300-A : of .Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents No.3 to * \ consider and dispose the petitioner's complaint dated 17.10.2022 in the Interest of justice. • ^ lA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents No.3 to consider and dispose the petitioner's complaint dated 17.10.2022 submitted through spandana, pending disposal of the writ petition in the interest of justice. Counsel for the PetitionerSRI SAZID KALLUR Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER APHC010696112022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3505] WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 41101/2022 Between: A Jayamma ...PETITIONER AND The State of Andhra Pradesh and others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.SAZID KALLUR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the foUowinq order: The petitioner claims that her husband Edigi Muthyalappa @ A.Muthyala Gowd was granted D-Form patta vide DAR Dis.No. 194/93, dated 13.03.1984 to an extent of Ac. 1.00 cents in Survey No.259-1 of Chennakothapalli Village and Mandal, Sri Satya Sai District. It is further case of the petitioner that since the date of assignment, her husband was in peaceful possession and enjoyment of the said land without any interruption. It is further stated that her husband filed a suit in O.S.No.241 of 1990 on the file of the Court of the learned District Munsif, Dharmavaram, against third parties when they tried to interfere with his possession. The said suit was decreed by judgment and decree, dated 20.03.1997. Subsequently, the husband of the petitioner was expired in the year 2002 and thereafter, the name of the petitioner was mutated in the revenue records and she was also issued pattadar passbooks. It is further case of the petitioner that while so, the respondents 3 and 5 orally directed the petitioner to vacate from the subject land inasmuch as the same is required for house site pattas in favour of eligible beneficieries. Despite showing the pattadar passbooks and adangals issued in her favour, the respondents 3 and 5 continued to interfere with the possession of the petitioner. In those circumstances, she caused a legal notice, dated 03.10.2022 to O'"* respondent apart from giving a complaint, dated 17.10.2022 in spandana programme. It is further case of the petitioner that without taking any action on the legal notice/representation made by her, the respondents are trying to interfere with her possession. Therefore, the present writ petition is filed. 2. This Court by order, dated 21.12.2022 passed an interim order directing the respondents not to interfere with the possession of the petitioner over the subject land without following the due process of law and the said interim order is subsisting till today. 3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, it is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that after the interim order passed by this Court, no action is initiated against the petitioner by the respondents. 4. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel, this Court feels that it is appropriate to dispose of the writ petition by directing the respondents not to interfere with the possession of the petitioner except in accordance with law. 5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any. shall stand closed. Sd/- K.J.RAJA BABU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Principal Secretary, State of Andhra Pradesh, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 2. The District Collector, Puttaparthy, Sri Satya Sai District, The Tahasildar, C.K. Palli Village and Mandal, Sri Satya Sai District. The Revenue DivisionalOfficer, Dharmavaram The Village Revenue Officer, C.K. Palli Village and Mandal, Sri Satya Sai District. The Mandal Surveyor, C.K. Palli Village and Mandal, Sri Satya Sai District. One CC to SRI. SAZID KALLUR Advocate [OPUC] Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] Three C.D.Copies 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. nm .HIGH COURT DATED:30/04/2025 ORDER WP.No.41101 of 2022 DISPOSING OF THE WP WITHOUT COSTS