MANOJ KUMAR S/O SHRI RAM PRATAP SINGH v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/17518/2023 · 2025-11-25
Ashok Kumar Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 45177 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 45177 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:47757] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17518/2023 Manoj Kumar S/o Shri Ram Pratap Singh, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Ward No. 11, Near National Public School, Hawai Patti, Jhunjhunu. ----Petitioner Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principle Secretary, Department Of Home, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. The Director General Of Police, Police Headquarter, Jaipur.
3. The Inspector General Of Police (Recruitment), Police Headquarter, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Surya Prakash For Respondent(s) : Ms. Somitra Chaturvedi, Dy.GC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
Order 25/11/2025
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner while placing reliance upon
order dated 03.03.2020 passed in S.B. Civiil Writ Petition No.1000/2019: Pawan Kumar Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors., submits that issue raised by the petitioner is already decided by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Hon’ble Court in case of Pawan Kumar (supra).
2.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondents submits that petitioner may file a representation in light of judgment relied by him and the department will consider accordingly.
3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-
[2025:RJ-JP:47757] (2 of 2) [CW-17518/2023] Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to decide the representation in light of ratio laid down in case of Pawan Kumar (supra) with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he has a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition.
4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of.
(ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J Chandan/282