Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 45164 (KAR)

SHRI MELAPPA GOUDAPPA PATIL v. SHRI ALAGOUDA SHIVANGOUDAPATIL

WP/107296/2023 · 2025-04-07

Jyoti Mulimani

Review Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:6127 WP No. 107296 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 107296 OF 2023 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SHRI MALLAPPA PATIL, AGE: 47 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: YARABATTI, TAL: RAIBAG, DIST: BELAGAVI. … PETITIONER (BY SRI. SANGRAM S.KULKARNI., ADVOCATE) AND: SHRI ALAGOUDA SHIVANGOUDA PATIL, AGE: 60 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: YARABATTI, TAL: RAIBAG, DIST: BELAGAVI. … RESPONDENT (BY SRI. A.S.PATIL, ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:6127 WP No. 107296 of 2023 ORAL ORDER Sri.Sangram S.Kulkarni., counsel for the petitioner has appeared in person. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the Writ Petition may be dismissed as having become infructuous. When queried, counsel Sri.Sangram S.Kulkarni, submits that a conscious decision is taken by him and the petitioner about infructuous of the petition and if an order is passed, they shall not seek for recalling the same or file a review petition. The oral submission made by counsel for the petitioner is placed on record. The Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE RH LIST NO.: 2 SL NO.: 1