Sl.No. 7 Court No. 35 G.S.Das 10.04.2025 WPA 26022 of 2024 Sekh Asmat Ali -Vs- The Officer-in-Charge, Manicktolla Police Station & Ors. Mr. Md. Sofiulla Mondal … for the Petitioner(s) Mr. K. J. Yusuf, Ld. AGP Mr. Parikshit Goswami … for the State-respondent(s) Mr. Arkadyuti Pahari … for the respondent nos.2-4 Report submitted by the State be kept with the record. Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that water connection has been restored, as such, he has no complaint in respect of inaction in relation to the communication made to the local police authorities is concerned. Learned advocate for the private respondent(s) submits that the police authorities have threatened them. However, if any inconveniences are faced by the petitioner, he will communicate the necessary grievances before the concerned higher police officials. Further pendency of the writ petition is unwarranted. With the aforesaid observations, WPA 26022 of 2024 is disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, is also disposed of. Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)