Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 45160 (RAJ)

SRAJAN TAMANG S/O MANG LAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/10893/2025 · 2025-10-15

Anil Kumar Upman

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:42202] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10893/2025 Srajan Tamang S/o Mang Lal, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Jugal P.s Dalbhat, District Sindhupal Chauk, Nepal Present Address Room No. 303, Hotel Sanjay Palace, Matiatal Road Opposite Polo Victory Cinema, P.s. Vidhayak Puri, Jaipur. That The Accused Is Presently Confined In Central Jail Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Misc. 2nd Bail Application No. 11523/2025 Pawan S/o Dharampal Goyal, R/o House No. 32 Pkt-16, Mother Dairy Ke Pass, Sector 20, Rohini, Sultanpuri, C Block, Police Station Amar Vihar, North West Delhi- 110086, Presently Residing At Room No. 303, Hotel Sanjay Palace, Moti Atal Polo Victory, Cinema Ke Samne Police Station Vidhayakpuri, Jaipur, Rajasthan. (Presently Confining In Central Jail Jaipur) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent S.B. Criminal Misc. 2nd Bail Application No. 11690/2025 Abbushama S/o Mohammad Amanullah, R/o J-364, H-2, Rakhi Market, Zakhira, Police Station Moti Nagar, West Delhi-110015, Presently Residing At Room No.303, Hotel Sanjay Palace, In Front Of Moti Atal Polo Victory Cinema, Police Station Vidhayakpuri, Jaipur (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus [2025:RJ-JP:42202] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-10893/2025] State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shashank Pancholi Mr. Amit Kumar Sharma Ms. Swati Sharma for Mr. Girish Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, PP with Mr. Gaurav Gupta, Asst. G.A. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 15/10/2025 After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioners seek permission to withdraw these bail applications with liberty to renew the prayer of bail after recording testimony of Investigating Officer. Permission as sought for is granted. Accordingly, these bail applications are dismissed as withdrawn with liberty, as prayed for. Learned trial court is requested to record the testimony of Investigating Officer on priority basis. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /72-74