KARTIK JAYDEO NAKADE v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. PSO PS NAGBHID, TQ. NAGBHID, DIST. CHANDRAPUR AND ANOTHER
APEAL/35/2025 · 2025-04-01
Urmila Joshi Phalke
Criminal Appealbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 45160 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 45160 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
(1) 54.apeal.35.2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.35 OF 2025
Kartik s/o Jaydeo Nakade Vs. State of Maharashtra, through Police Station Officer, Police Station, Nagbhid, District Chandrapur and another
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. Yusuf Jameel Sheikh, Counsel for the appellant. Ms. H. N. Prabhu, APP for respondent No.1/State. Ms. S. H. Bhagat, appointed Counsel for the respondent No.2.
CORAM : URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J.
DATED : 01/04/2025
1. Heard learned Counsel for the appellant to some extent and I have shown my disinclination to grant bail. Learned Counsel for the appellant seeks permission to withdraw the appeal.
2. The Special Court shall expedite the trial and shall dispose of at the earliest.
3. The appeal is disposed of as withdrawn.
4. The fees of the appointed Counsel be quantified as per rules.
(URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J.) Sarkate 2025:BHC-NAG:3699-DB