EiIE= I-i <t lN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVA FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF APRIL /~ TWOTHOUSANDANDTWENTYFIVE z,z :PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA R CRIMINALPETITION NO: 2184OF2025 / Between: Mr. Chanduluri Rupesh Kumar @ Ram~`esh, S/o Ch.Venkata Narasimha rao, Age 52 years, Occ: Business, R/o H.No.3A-14-8/2, Geetha Bhavan Road, Near Ramakoti, EIuru, West Godavari District. Mobile 97053 87878 Petitioner/Accused No.1 AND The State OfAndhra Pradesh, Rep. by I'tS Public Prosecutor, High Court Buildings, Amaravathi, Velagapudi, Guntur District. Respondent I.A Petition under section 482 of BNSS., is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the memorandum of grounds filed in support of the CriminalPetition, the High Court may be pleased to enlarge the petitioner on Bail in the event of petitioner is being arrested in relating to the CrI'me No.172 of 2022 of P.S. Padamata, Vijayawada in the interest of justice. lANO: 1 OF2025 Petition under section 482 of BNSS., is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the memorandum of grounds filed in support of the CriminaIPetition, the High Court may be pleased to receive the additional material papers in Criml'nal Petition No. 2184 of 2025 on the file of the Hon'ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravathi in the interest of justice, The petitI'On coming On for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the memorandum of grounds filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. KURITI BHASKARA RAO Advocate for the petitioner and of Public Prosecutor for the Respondent; The Court made the following ORDER: / /-, .4 . EZi E-E Z, APHCO10104232025 J/ IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATl (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE I MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2184/2025 Between : Mr Chanduluri RupeSh Kumar @ Ramesh AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: 1. KURITI BHASKARA RAO [3369] ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED H|RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT Counsel for the Respondent/complainant: 1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: ORDER: This Criminal Petition, u/Sec.482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha sanhita, 2023, has been filed by the petitioner/accused seek'Ing antiCiPatOry bail, in Crime No.172/2022 of Patamata Police Station, Vijayawada City. 2. A case has been registered against the Petitioner for the OffenCeS punishable u/Sec.419, 420, 487, 488, 471, 474, 506 lPC. 3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant public Prosecutor representing the respondent/State. 4. Case of the prosecution, in brief, 'lS that, this iS a Case Of Cheating that was occurred prior to 16.02.2O22 at D.No.7-91/1, Prasadampadu, *- \-=9 -¢ \\_.+ 9 *-*`-» 2. vijayawada and reported-ton 16102.2022 at 9.00 pm in which the complainant Dandibatla Satya Siva Sankara Subramanya -Sastri, reported that he is working as a priest. The complainant purchased two cars 1.. XUV 5OOW10 bearing registration no.AP 16 EF 4609 and 2. KUV 100 NXTK8650 bearing registration no.AP 16 FD 5664 by obtaining loan from bank and he was paying monthly EMl. On 2020 December, he suffered from brain effect and he took treatment in Vijayawada. For that he borrowed Rs|4,OO,000/- from the accused. Due to his health problems, he pledged his two Vehicles to the accused. At that time, the complainant had given 16 empty chequesJ 8 promissory notes, signed white papers. Due to his health condition, he did not pay any interest to the bank. Then bank officials came and gave notice to the complainant. The accrised took the above vehicle records and changed record without giving the finger print of the complainant. Hence the ?'~ complaint. 5. Heard. Perused the record. 6. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is cooperating for investigation and prays to allow the criminal petition, 7. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor submitted that as directed by this Court, the petitioner is cooperating for investigation and the investigation is almost comple.ted and submitted that the court may pass appropriate orders. 8, When ascertained with regard to the stage of the investigation, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor.submitted that the investigation is .. fif- - \ 3 almost completed and so far no incriminating material has been COIIected showing the involvement of the petitioner in the commission of the offence. considering the said submissions, this court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, but with some conditions. 9. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed tO Surrender before the concerned police station within a period of two (02) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the order and on his surrender the petitioner shall be released on bail on his executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand only) with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the arresting police officials and the petitioner shall make himself available for investigation as and when required and he shall not cause any threat, inducement or promise to the prosecution witnesses. sD/-K.J.RAJA BABU ASSISTAN /ITRUE COPY// ;JEAGTs:nT-RvA F` I( To, 1. The Station House Officer, Padamata Police Station, Vijayawada, NTR #~ District. 21 One CCto Sri. KURITI BHASKARA RAO, Advocate [OPUC] 4 3. Two CCs to PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, High Court ofAndhra Pradesh, / Amaravati. [OUT] 4. One spare copy JSS /- . d' / l 0 \ Ÿi0 1‹ g HIGH COURT TMRI J DATED :25/04/2025 BAIL ORDER CRLP.No.2184 of 2025 ALLOWED A,--( irF-vi-, -``