CHITT NARAYAN PATHAK v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/5197/2025 · 2025-05-07
Vikram D Chauhan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 45153 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 45153 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:74728 Court No. - 7 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 5197 of 2025 Petitioner :- Chitt Narayan Pathak Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Alok Krishan Tripathi,Arpit Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Vikram D. Chauhan,J. In Re: Civil Misc. Impleadment Application No.2 of 2025
1. The impleadment application is filed for impleading Director of Education (Madhyamik) U.P. at Prayagraj as respondent no.5.
2. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection.
3. The impleadment application is allowed.
4. Let necessary impleadment be incorporated during course of the day. In Re:Writ Petition
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State.
2. The writ petition is filed with the following prayer:
"a. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to pay interest for 27 months on actual payment of Rs.36,80,346/- within stipulated time frame as fixed by this Hon'ble Court."
3. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that retiral dues have been paid with delay of 27 months and the petitioner is claiming interest on such delay. In this respect, petitioner has filed representation before the respondent, however till date, no order has been passed.
4. Learned Standing Counsel submits that claim of the petitioner would be decided in a time bound manner.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, it is hereby provided that petitioner shall file fresh representation before
respondent no.5-Director of Education (Madhyamik) U.P. at Prayagraj within 15 days from today along with a certified copy of this order. The same shall be considered and decided by respondent no.5 within a period of two months thereafter.
6. It is clarified that this Court has not decided the issue on merits and the authorities concerned shall independently apply its mind and pass order in accordance with law.
7. With the aforesaid observation/direction, the writ petition stands
disposed of.
Order Date :- 8.5.2025 D. Tamang Digitally signed by :- DHIRENDRA TAMANG High Court of Judicature at Allahabad