IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY ,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NOS: 10845 AND 10850 OF 2025 WRIT PETITION NO: 10845 OF 2025 Between: Kuthadi Venkata Ramana, W/o. Sathaiah, R/o. No. 14-9-2/2 , Basivireddy Peta, Nidadavolu Mandal Nidadavole, East Godavari-534301. ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Department of Municipal Administration and Urban Development, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravati. 2. The Nidadavole Municipality, Rep. by its Commissioner, Nidadavole East Godavari District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction or writ, more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 2 nd respondent in trying to evict and dispossess the petitioner by demolishing the RCC structure house in the land to an extent of 16*7.5 Sq. Meters in Sy.No. 282 of Revenue Ward No. 14 of Basivipetta Nidadavaole without according an opportunity of hearing in Encroachment Notice No. 2/2025/WPRS- 11/NDVL and without following due process of law as illegal, arbitrary, violative of principles of natural justice, unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents not to evict and dispossess the petitioner by demolishing the RCC structure house in the land to an extent of 16*7.5 Sq. Meters in Sy.No. 282 of Revenue Ward No. 14 of Basivipetta, Nidadavaole except strictly in accordance with law and after giving appropriate and effective opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to demolish and dispossess the petitioner from the land to an extent of 16*7.5 Sq. Meters in Sy.No.282 of Revenue Ward No; 14 of Basivipetta, Nidadavaole, East Godavari District pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: M/S BOPPUDI ALEKHYA Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP Counsel for the Respondent No.2: M/S V. SIREESHA RANI, SC FOR MUNICIPALITY WRIT PETITION NO: 10850 OF 2025 Between: Manupati Kasi, S/o. Trimurthulu, Aged about 32 years, R/o. 14-9-1 Main Road, Basivireddy Peta, Nidadavole, Nidadavole Mandal, East Godavari District, 534301. ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Department of Municipal Administration and Urban Development, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravati. 2. The Nidadavole Municipality, Rep. by its Commissioner, Nidadavole East Godavari District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction or writ, more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 2 nd respondent in trying to evict and dispossess the petitioner by demolishing the RCC structure house in the land to an extent of 13*7.5 Sq. Meters in Sy.No. 282 of Revenue Ward No- 14 of Basivipetta, Nidadavaole without according an opportunity of hearing in Encroachment Notice No 1/2025AA/PRS- 11/NDVLand without following due process of law as illegal, arbitrary, violative of principles of natural justice, unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents not to evict and dispossess the petitioner by demolishing the RCC structure house in the land to an extent of 13 7.5 Sq. Meters in Sy.No. 282 of Revenue Ward No 14 of Basivipetta, Nidadavaoleexcept strictly in accordance with law and after giving appropriate and effective opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to demolish and dispossess the petitioner from the land to an extent of 13*7.5 Sq. Meters in Sy.No. 282 of Revenue Ward No: 14 of Basivipetta, Nidadavaole, East Godavari District pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: M/S BOPPUDI ALEKHYA Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP Counsel for the Respondent No.2: M/S V. SIREESHA RANI, SC FOR MUNICIPALITY The Court made the following Common Order: APHC010218072025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 10845/2025 Between: 1.KUTHADI VENKATA RAMANA, W/0. SATHAIAH, R/0. NO. 14-9-2/2 , BASIVIREDDY PETA, NIDADAVOLU MANDAL NIDADAVOLE, EAST GODAVARI- 534301. ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI. 2.THE NIDADAVOLE MUNICIPALITY, REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER, NIDADAVOLE, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT{S); WRIT PETITION NO: 10850/2025 Between: 1.MANUPATI KASI,, S/0. TRIMURTHULU, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, R/0. 14-9-1 MAIN ROAD, BASIVIREDDY PETA, NIDADAVOLE, NIDADAVOLE MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, 534301. ...PETITIONER AND 2 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI. SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, 2.THE NIDADAVOLE MUNICIPALITY, REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER, NIDADAVOLE, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.BOPPUDI ALEKHYA Counsel for the Respondent{S): 1.GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP The Court made the following: *I\l 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NOs: 10845 and 10850/2025 COMMON ORDER: 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners on instructions submits that the petitioners were allotted alternative house sites and they intend to construct their houses in the allotted house sites and do not wish to pursue these writ petitions. 2. Accordingly, these writ petitions are dismissed. There shall be order as to costs. no As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. SDI- G HELA NAIDU ASSISTANT F^JSTRAR SECTIOtMOFFICER //TRUE COPY// To, 1. One CC to M/S BOPPUDI ALEKHYA, Advocate [OPUC] One CC to M/S V. SIREESH RANI, STANDING COUNSEL FOR MUNICIPALITY [OPUC] Two CCs to GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP, High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] Three CD Copies 2. 3. 4. sree HIGH COURT DATED:30/04/2025 COMMON ORDER WP.Nos.10845 & 10850 of 2025 1 h JUL 2025 iTT -''••irentSectioo/W eo 19 ★ ^sSll DISMISSING THE W.Ps. WITHOUT COSTS