Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 45151 (AP)

KALYANI YESUDASU v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

CRLP/4158/2025 · 2025-04-28

K Sreenivasa Reddy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

t*.r. ^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI TUESDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 4158 OF 2025 8^ Qo » f' ‘ -- :-4„ Between: Kalyani Yesudasu, S/oJayababu, Aged about 27 years, Occ; Private Employee, R/o. Nagaram Village and Mandal, Guntur District. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED No.4 AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh, through S.H.O., Ponnuru Town Police Station, represented by its Public Prosecutor at High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Nelapadu, Amaravathi. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT Petition under Section 482 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest in connection with the case in crime No. 105 of 2024 on the file of SHO, Ponnur Town P.S., Guntur District, which was registered for the alleged offences under sections 403, 406, 409, 420, 120(B) r/w 34 of IPC and 66-D of Information Technology Act 2000 & 2008 in the interest of justice. I.A.'NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section Si ’is 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the cr^umstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal the High Court may be pleased to direct the petitioner in connection with Petition respondent not to arrest the crime No. 105 of 2024 on the file of SHO Ponnur Town P.S., Guntur District, which was registered for the alleged offences under sections 403, 406, 409, 420, 120(B) r/w 34 of IPC and 66-D of Information Technology Act 2000 86 2008 in the interest of justice. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandu of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri KARANKI YASWANTH, Advocate for the Petitioner Prosecutor on behaif of the Respondent. The Court made the following: m and the Public THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 4158 OF 2025 ORDER: The Criminal Petition, under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, is filed on behalf of the petitioner/A4 to grant anticipatory bail in connection with Crime No.105/2024 of Ponnur Town Police Station, Guntur District. 2. A case has been registered against the petitioner and others for the offences punishable under Sections 403, 406, 409, 420, 120B read with 34 of the IPC, 66-D ITA-2000-2008. Case of the prosecution in brief is that the informant is the Small Finance Bank Limited branch of Ponnur and 3. Manager of Fin Care A1 to A11 were working in his branch as Village Microfinance Loan Sanctioning Manager and other positions. They went to villages and got sanctioned Grameena Micro Finance Loans to public in that company, the loan amount from customers and After sanction of loans, recovering deposit to the branch is the main role of the accused. On 24.01.2024, to Ponnur Branch and conducted audit. Then he accused used several mobile numbers and they are the informant came found that the registered as their personal numbers. The informant identified that A1 to All cheated the public by saying that their mobile number was not \ 2 registered to their account. The public believed their deceitful words and told the OTP to the accused. The accused cheated the public with common intention and misappropriated the public loan amount. The accused took total loan amount of Rs.43,76,884/- from the public and deposited an amount of Rs.11,87,446/- to company and they cheated the company and misappropriated the funds of the company i.e. public money to a tune of Rs.35,10,579/- with common intention. Hence, the present case. 4. Heard. Perused the record. 5. A perusal of the material available on record goes to show that, a specific accusation has been attributed as against the petitioner herein. In view of the said reason, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. However, the petitioner is directed to surrender and make an application before the Court below for grant of Regular Bail and the Court below is directed to pass appropriate orders on merits on the same day. 6. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is disposed of. Sd/- N. NAGAMMA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// /b^ECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Station House Officer, Ponnur Town Police Station, Guntur District. One CC to Sri Karanki Yaswanth, Advocate [OPUC] Two GO'S to the Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati [OUT] 2. 3. 4. Three CD Copies RDR / % HIGH COURT DATED:29/04/2025 ORDER CRLP.No.4158 of 2025 disposed of the criminal petition