VIJAY LAXMI D/O SHRI NATHULAL v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLW/1514/2025 · 2025-12-03
Anoop Kumar Dhand
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 45145 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 45145 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:49181] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 1514/2025 Vijay Laxmi D/o Shri Nathulal, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Behind Maliyon Ki Dharamshala, Sambhar Lake, Tehsil Phulera, District Jaipur (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Home, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur
2. Director General Of Police, Rajasthan, Police Head Quarter, Lalkothi, Jaipur
3. Superintendent Of Police, Jaipur Rural
4. Sho, Police Station Sambhar Lake, District Jaipur
5. Kiran Kumawat W/o Shri Nathulal, R/o Behind Maliyon Ki Dharamshala, Sambhar Lake, Tehsil Phulera, District Jaipur (Raj.)
6. Kusum D/o Shri Nathu Lal, R/o Behind Maliyon Ki Dharamshala, Sambhar Lake, Tehsil Phulera, District Jaipur (Raj.)
7. Sangeeta D/o Nathulal, R/o Behind Maliyon Ki Dharamshala, Sambhar Lake, Tehsil Phulera, District Jaipur (Raj.)
8. Mukesh Kumawat S/o Balchand Kumawat, R/o Bera Ki Dhani, Boraj, District Jaipur ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Fakruddin For Respondent(s) : Mr.Vivek Choudhary, PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Order 03/12/2025
1. The instant criminal writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:-
[2025:RJ-JP:49181] (2 of 3) [CRLW-1514/2025]
“It is therefore, respectfully prayed that your Lordship may graciously be pleased to accept and allow this writ petition and i) The respondent No.1 to 4 may kindly be
directed to provide adequate safety ad protection to the Petitioner from respondent No.5 to 8 for her life and liberty. ii) The respondent No.1 to 4 may further be
directed to take necessary action/steps against the respondent No.5 to 8 and they may also restrained from creating any obstructions in the living of the Petitioner in village or any other place. iii) Any other order which this Hon’ble Court deemed just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may also be passed in favour of the petitioner.”
2. By way of filing the instant criminal writ petition, a prayer has been made for providing adequate safety and protection to the petitioner at the hands of the private respondents.
3. In the considered opinion of this Court, before approaching this Court, the petitioner is supposed to approach the concerned Nodal Officer/ Police Officer in terms of the judgment passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Suman Meena vs. State of Rajasthan while deciding S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No.792/2024.
4. In case, any representation is submitted by the petitioner in terms of the judgment passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Suman Meena (supra), it is expected from the concerned Nodal Officer to pass appropriate reasoned and speaking orders.
[2025:RJ-JP:49181] (3 of 3) [CRLW-1514/2025]
5. With the above observation, the instant criminal writ petition stands disposed of. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Aayush Sharma /183