168 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-3553-2025 Date of Decision:09.04.2025 MANJEET ...Petitioner Vs. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ...Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present: Mr. Sandeep Saini, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. B.S. Virk, Senior DAG, Haryana. SANDEEP MOUDGIL , J. (Oral) The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for directing the respondents Nos. 1 to 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner from the hands of respondent no. 4 to 6. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he will be satisfied in case a direction be issued to respondent No.2 to look into the representation dated 30.03.2025 (Annexure P-2), within a time bound manner. Without adverting to the merits of the case and in view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2-Assistant Commissioner of Police, Pataudi, Gurugram, to look into the representation dated 30.03.2025 (Annexure P-2) and decide the same in accordance with law within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this order. Copy of the order so passed be conveyed to the petitioner in the next three days thereafter. (SANDEEP MOUDGIL) JUDGE 09.04.2025 kv Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No KUMUD VERMA 2025.04.11 15:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh