Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010348882017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI TUESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 784 OF 2017 Appeal under Order 43 Rule 1 of CPC against the Order and Decree dated 14-1.0-2005 passed in lA No.624 of 2005 in MVOP No.168 of 2000 on the file of the Chairman, Motor Vehicle Accidents Claims Additional District Judge, Krishna, Machilipatnam. Between: Tribunal-cum-l
1. Gogulamudi Pothuraju, S/o.Subba Rao, aged 47 years, R/o.14*^ Ward, Gudivada, Krishna District. 2. Gogulamudi Joshph Tambi, S/o.Pothuraju, aged 20 years, R/o.14^^ Ward, Gudivada, Krishna District. 3. Gogulamudi Vijaya kumar, S/o.Pothuraju, aged 14 years (Minor) R/o.14‘^ Ward, Gudivada, Krishna District. 4. Gogulamudi Nani Babu, S/o.Pothuraju, aged 10 Ward, Gudivada, Krishna District. (Appellants 3 and 4 years (Minor) R/o.14' are Minors, rep by 1** Appellant G.Pothuraju) ...APPELLANTS/PETITIONERS
AND
1. Gogulamudi Bebi, W/o.Pothuraju, aged about 37 years. Working i Bhaskara Talkies, R/o.Gudivada, Krishna District. in
2. Srikakulapu Srinivasa Rao, S/o.Bogeswara Rao No.AAK 631 Hindu, Driver of Lorry R/o.Dr.No.1-68, Valivarethipadu, Gudivada Krishna District. 3. Shaik Masthan, S/o.Subhani, Muslim. No.AAK 631, R/o.Gudivada, Krishna District. 4. The New India Assurance Company Manager, O/o.Gudivada, Krishna District. (R3 dismissed for default, vide Court Order, aged 42 years. Owner of Lorry Limited, Rep by its Branch dated 16-02-2015) ...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS Counsel for Appellants : SRI YALLABANDI RAMATIRTHA Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 and Counsel for the Respondent No.4 : RAO 2 : NONE APPEARED SRI NAGUMANTRI NAGESWARA The Court made the following JUDGMENT :
APHC010348882017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3506] TUESDAY.THE FIFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 784/2017 Between;
1.GOGULAMUDDI POTHURAJU & 3 ORS, S/O.SUBBA RAO R/0.14TH WARD, GUDIVADA, KRISHNA DIST. 2.GOGULAMUDI JOSHPH TAMBI, S/O.POTHARAJU R/0.14TH WARD, GUDIVADA, KRISHNA DIST. 3.GOGULAMUDI VIJAYA KUMAR, S/O.POTHARAJU MINOR R/0.14TH WARD, GUDIVADA, KRISHNA DIST. 4.GOGULAMUDI NANI BABU, S/0.POTHURAJU MINOR, APPE. 3 AND 4 ARE REP BY 1ST APPELLANT G.POTHURAJU R/0.14TH WARD, GUDIVADA, KRISHNA DIST. ...APPELLANT(S) AND 1.GOGULAMUDI BEBI 3 ORS, W/0.POTHURAJU WORKIGN IN BHASKARA TALKIES R/O.GUDIVADA, KRISHNA DIST. 2.SRIKAKULAPU SRINIVASA RAO, S/O.BOGESWARA RAO DRIVER OF LORRY NO.AAK 631 R/O.D.NO.1-68, VALIVARETHIPADU,GUDIVADA, 3.SHAIK MASTHAN, S/O.SUBHANI, MUSLIM OWNER OF LORRY NO.AAK 631 R/0 GUDIVADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4.THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMTIED, REP BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER 0/0.GUDIVADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
2 CGR,J CMA No.784 of 2017 ...RESPONDENT(S): Appeal Under Section against ordersCMA against the
order and decree dated 14th Oct, 2005 passed in lA No.624/2005 in MVOP No. 168/2000 on thefiie of the Motor Vechile Accidents Claims tribunal cum I Addl.District Judge, Krishna, Machilipatna m LA NO: 1 OF 2008(CMAMP 211 OF 2008 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased condone the delay of 204 representing the above CMASR No.4245 of 2008 days in ' <A NO: 2 OF 2008fCMAMP 212 OF 2008 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the the High Court may be pleased condone the delay of filing the above CMA in the petition, days in 82 Counsel for the Appellant(S):
1.YALLABANDI RAMATIRTHA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.NAGUMANTRI NAGESWARA RAO 2.T RAMULU The Court made the following;
3 CGR,J CMA No.784 of 2017
JUDGMENT:
Learned counsel for the appellants submits that he has no instructions from the appellants. It appears that they do not intend to prosecute the matter. Accordingly, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed for
2. non prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
SD/- E.KAMESWARA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To,
1. The Chairr^an, Motor Vehicle Accidents Additional District Judge, Krishna, Machilipatnam.
2. One CC to Sri Yallabahdi Ramatirtha, Advocate [OPUC]
3. One CC to Sri Nagumantri Nageswara Rao, Advocate [OPUC]
4. The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court Amaravathi
5. Two CD Copies Claims Tribunal-cum-l of Andhra Pradesh at BSV TAC
HIGH COURT DATED:05/08/2025
JUDGMENT CMA NO. 784 OF 2017 dismissing the CMA FOR NON-PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS